Home›Articles›Gurdjieff, the Symbol, and the Sufi ClaimArticlesGurdjieff, the Symbol, and the Sufi ClaimCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Gurdjieff, the Symbol, and the Sufi Claim." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/the-achiever-gurdjieff-the-symbol-and-the-sufi-claim.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Gurdjieff, the Symbol, and the Sufi Claim. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/the-achiever-gurdjieff-the-symbol-and-the-sufi-claimCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-gurdjieff-the-symbol-and-the-sufi-claim, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Gurdjieff, the Symbol, and the Sufi Claim}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/the-achiever-gurdjieff-the-symbol-and-the-sufi-claim}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreGurdjieff, the Symbol, and the Sufi Claim The nine-pointed figure itself is older than the personality system and comes from a different world. G. I. Gurdjieff taught the enneagram symbol to his students from around 1916, presenting it as a diagram of process, the law of three and the law of seven, and used it to describe how any transformation unfolds; he did not attach personality types to it, and none of his published students does either. Gurdjieff said he had received his teaching from esoteric sources in central Asia and the Middle East, and this became, in later popular Enneagram literature, a claim of Sufi origin. No such Sufi source has been produced, no Sufi order is known to have used the figure in this way, and later authors including Riso and Hudson have acknowledged that the personality typology is modern. The symbol and the typology were joined by Ichazo and Naranjo in the twentieth century. Gurdjieff's own account of encountering teachers in central Asia appears chiefly in Meetings with Remarkable Men, part of his unfinished All and Everything trilogy, published posthumously in 1963 after his death in 1949 and adapted into a 1979 film directed by Peter Brook, shot on location in Afghanistan. James Moore, whose 1991 biography Gurdjieff: The Anatomy of a Myth remains a standard reference, reads the book as a teaching narrative shaped for its didactic effect rather than as a reliable travelogue, a judgment that further weakens any claim that a documented Sarmoung Brotherhood lies behind the enneagram figure.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Achiever, Enneagram Types Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year