Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Councils and Synods

The Synod of Dort

Also Known As Synod of Dort Short form. The atlas files this entry under a longer name and readers reach for the shorter one.
Christian Councils

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

An international synod of the Dutch Reformed Church held at Dordrecht in the Dutch Republic from November 1618 to May 1619, convened by the States General to settle the dispute between the Reformed church's Contra-Remonstrant majority and the Arminian Remonstrant minority over predestination, grace and free will. Delegates from Reformed churches in England, Switzerland, the Palatinate and elsewhere joined the Dutch delegation, giving the assembly an international character unusual for a national synod. The Synod condemned the Remonstrant position and issued the Canons of Dort, later summarized under the mnemonic TULIP, which became a confessional standard for Reformed churches worldwide.

Facts
The Event
Principal Parties
The Contra-Remonstrant majority of the Dutch Reformed Church, joined by Reformed delegates from England, Switzerland, the Palatinate and other territories, against the Remonstrant minority who held the Arminian position on grace and predestination 1
Consequences
Lasting Consequence
Remonstrant ministers were removed from their pulpits and some exiled; the Canons became, alongside the Belgic Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism, one of the Three Forms of Unity subscribed by the Dutch Reformed Church 2
History
Historical Note
The Canons' five points are commonly summarized today by the mnemonic TULIP, a later teaching device rather than a term used at the Synod itself 1
Learn More
The Five Articles and the Synod's Answer

The Synod of Dort was convened to settle a dispute that had divided the Dutch Reformed Church since the Remonstrance of 1610, a petition drawn up by followers of the recently deceased theologian Jacobus Arminius setting out five points on grace and salvation. The Remonstrants held that God's election of believers was conditional on foreseen faith, that Christ's atonement was offered for all people though effective only for believers, that fallen human nature retained some capacity to respond to grace, that grace could be resisted, and that a believer's perseverance in faith was not absolutely certain.

Meeting from November 1618 to May 1619, with delegates from Reformed churches in England, Switzerland, the Palatinate, Hesse and other territories sitting alongside the Dutch, the Synod examined and rejected all five articles. In their place its Canons set out what it held scripture to teach: that human corruption after the fall left no capacity in the will to move toward faith unaided, that God's election is unconditional rather than based on foreseen response, that Christ's death is sufficient for all but efficacious for the elect, that grace once given is not finally resisted, and that those truly regenerated persevere to the end. The Remonstrant delegation, led by Simon Episcopius, was treated through the proceedings as a party on trial rather than as synod members with a vote, and departed before the Canons were finalized.

The Synod's proceedings ran to more than one hundred and fifty formal sessions over six months, working through each of the five Remonstrant points in turn before compiling its own answer into the Canons proper, structured under five corresponding heads of doctrine so that each article of the Remonstrance received a direct reply.

A Dutch Political Crisis Given an International Synod

The theological dispute was inseparable from a political one. The Remonstrant position had powerful backers in the Dutch Republic's civil government, chief among them the Land's Advocate of Holland, Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, who favored toleration and resisted a national synod, while Prince Maurice of Orange, the Republic's stadtholder and military leader, sided with the Contra-Remonstrant party and moved against Oldenbarnevelt's faction in 1618. Oldenbarnevelt was arrested that August, tried on charges of treason arising from the same conflict, and executed in May 1619, within days of the Synod's own closing sessions, though the two proceedings were formally separate.

Once the Synod ruled, some two hundred Remonstrant ministers were deposed from their pulpits across the Republic, and a number, including Episcopius, went into exile; a toleration decree restored their legal standing only decades later, and a small Remonstrant Brotherhood continues in the Netherlands today. The Canons of Dort took their place alongside the Belgic Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism as the Three Forms of Unity subscribed by the Dutch Reformed Church, and the Synod's five heads of doctrine spread through Presbyterian and Reformed churches well beyond the Netherlands, later summarized under the mnemonic TULIP, a teaching device that postdates the Synod by centuries rather than a term used at Dort itself.

Maurice's purge reached beyond the church itself: in the months around the Synod, town councils and civic militias across Holland sympathetic to Oldenbarnevelt were replaced with men loyal to the Contra-Remonstrant and stadtholder's party, reinforcing the political and theological verdicts, though the Synod itself passed no sentence on him.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Element Of

The canons of Dort are the Reformed answer to the Remonstrants, and the five heads of doctrine settled there are the confessional core of the Reformed churches.

Source The Canons of the Synod of DortSynod of Dortthe holders' own account

Received in the Church of Scotland Reformed inheritance, alongside the Westminster Confession.

Source The Westminster Confession of FaithWestminster Assemblythe holders' own account

Dort was the national synod of this church, and its canons stand with the Belgic Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism as its confessional standards.

Source The Canons of the Synod of DortSynod of Dortthe holders' own account

Received in the Presbyterian churches, whose Westminster standards teach the same doctrine of election and perseverance that Dort defined.

Source The Westminster Confession of FaithWestminster Assemblythe holders' own account

Rejected Here

Church of the Nazarene, Denominations

The holiness churches refuse the canons of Dort, and their teaching on entire sanctification rests on the Arminian account of grace that Dort condemned.

Source The Sermons of John WesleyJohn Wesley
Free Methodist Church, Denominations

Refused, on the Arminian ground the Methodist churches hold in common.

Source The Sermons of John WesleyJohn Wesley
Methodism, Denominations

Methodism is Arminian, and Wesley preached directly against the doctrine of unconditional election that Dort defined, holding that it makes God the author of the destruction of the reprobate.

Source The Sermons of John WesleyJohn Wesley
The United Methodist Church, Denominations

Refused, on the Arminian ground Methodism has held since Wesley.

Source The Sermons of John WesleyJohn Wesley
Wesleyan Church, Denominations

The Wesleyan churches refuse the canons of Dort on election and on the limited extent of the atonement, holding that Christ died for all.

Source The Sermons of John WesleyJohn Wesley

Produces

The Canons of Dort are the Synod's own decrees, its five heads of doctrine against the Remonstrant articles.

Source The Canons of the Synod of DortSynod of Dortthe holders' own account

Related To

The Synod's Canons became a confessional standard of Reformed (Calvinist) churches.

The Synod ruled on predestination and free will against the Remonstrant position.

Source The Canons of the Synod of DortSynod of Dortthe holders' own account

Both councils ruled on grace, human will and predestination; Reformation era theologians on both sides invoked Orange's canons in the dispute that Dort was convened to settle.

Source Reformation: Europe's House Divided 1490-1700Diarmaid MacCulloch
Sources
1. Reformation: Europe's House Divided 1490-1700
Diarmaid MacCulloch, Allen Lane, 2003View the Source
2. The Creeds of Christendom, with a History and Critical Notes
Philip Schaff, Harper and Brothers, 1877View the Source
Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
The Canons of the Synod of Dort
Synod of Dort, 1619the holders' own accountView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.