Origin 412 to 529 CE
If God is sovereign and knows all things, and if salvation is a gift rather than a wage, then it is hard to see what is left for a human being to contribute. If nothing is left, it is hard to see how anyone can be held responsible. Western Christianity has been arguing about this since the fifth century and has produced no settlement, only a set of positions that have hardened into confessional identities.
Three things make it intractable. The scriptural material genuinely pulls both ways, and each side has verses it must explain rather than cite. The question is not one question but several, foreknowledge, election, the extent of the atonement, whether grace can be resisted, whether the saved can fall away, and a position on one does not settle the others. And the stakes are pastoral rather than academic: what is being decided is whether assurance rests on God or on the believer, which is why the argument has repeatedly turned bitter.
The Eastern churches have largely not had this argument in this form. Their inheritance runs through Greek fathers who did not read Romans 5 through the Latin of Augustine, and the framing of grace as a quantity in competition with freedom looks to them like a Western problem rather than a Christian one.
Facts
Origins
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account Held ByReformed and Calvinist theology, following Augustine and Calvin, holds unconditional double predestination, confessed at the Synod of Dort and in the Westminster Confession; Arminian and Wesleyan Methodist theology holds election conditioned on God's foreknowledge of a freely chosen faith. 2 Status
Status Within the TraditionDefined and binding within this tradition 3Tradition: Calvinism (Reformed) Sourced to the subject's own accountUnconditional election is confessed at Dort and in the Westminster Confession Status Within the TraditionStandard teaching, not formally defined 2Tradition: Methodism Status Within the TraditionGenuinely disputed within this tradition 2Tradition: Roman Catholicism The Claim
The ClaimThe question of whether an omniscient and sovereign God has fixed in advance who will be saved, and if so, how this is compatible with human moral freedom and responsibility. 2 Belief
Defining Doctrinal PositionAugustine and, more systematically, John Calvin held that God unconditionally elects some to salvation, a position formalised in Reformed theology as double predestination; Jacobus Arminius and Wesleyan theology held election to be conditional on God's foreknowledge of a freely chosen faith. 2 Position Profile
Principal CriticErasmus of Rotterdam argued against Luther for the freedom of the will in their exchange, Erasmus's Diatribe and Luther's reply, The Bondage of the Will. 2 Learn More
The Longest Argument in the West
Whether a person's salvation rests finally on God's prior choice or on the person's own decision, and how much of each there is, is the longest-running argument in Western Christianity. It recurs because the New Testament itself pulls in two directions: Romans 8-9 speaks of an eternal election and of God having mercy "on whomever he wills," while other texts declare that God "desires all people to be saved." Any position has to say something about the texts it leans on less.
The argument opens with Augustine and Pelagius. Augustine, pressing the priority of grace, came to teach that God from eternity chooses those who will be saved and that their salvation is his gift from first to last. Pelagius defended an intact human freedom that could turn to God unaided. The church condemned Pelagius, but Augustine's harder conclusions about election were themselves felt to be dangerous, and the Western tradition spent the next thousand years working out how much of Augustine to keep, which is why the map of positions is unusually crowded.
The Catholic House Divided: Thomist and Molinist
Even within a single communion the question splits. The Augustinian inheritance is the baseline all Western positions argue from. Within Catholic theology two schools are permitted and unreconciled. The Thomist account, following Thomas Aquinas and later the Dominican Domingo Banez, holds that God's grace is intrinsically efficacious, it infallibly moves the will it is given to, yet does so in a way that leaves the act genuinely free, because God moves each thing according to its nature. The Molinist account, devised by the Jesuit Luis de Molina in his Concordia of 1588, introduces middle knowledge: God knows what every possible free creature would freely do in every possible circumstance, and providentially arranges circumstances accordingly, so that grace is efficacious without overriding a freedom that could have refused.
The dispute grew heated enough that around 1600 Rome convened the Congregatio de Auxiliis to judge between the schools, and in the end declined to condemn either. Both remain live: the Molinist appeal to middle knowledge has been revived in recent decades by analytic philosophers of religion. The Tridentine definitions of the Council of Trent set the outer bounds all Catholic positions keep within, affirming both grace's priority and the reality of free cooperation.
The Reformation Divide, and the Eastern Refusal of the Frame
The Reformation hardened the question into confessional walls. The Reformed position of Calvin, codified at the Synod of Dort (1618-19) and the Westminster Confession, teaches unconditional election: God chooses the saved without regard to foreseen merit or faith, and saving grace is effectual. The Arminian position, set out by the Remonstrants in 1610 and later carried by John Wesley, answers that election is conditional upon foreseen faith and that grace, though necessary and prior, can be resisted; it is held today across Methodist, Wesleyan, Pentecostal and much of world evangelicalism. The five points summarised at Dort were framed precisely as replies to the five Remonstrant articles, which is why the two systems mirror each other point for point.
The Eastern churches largely decline the terms of the Western debate. The Greek fathers and modern Orthodox theologians treat salvation as synergy, a real cooperation of divine grace and human freedom, and read the predestination texts as God's foreknowledge of free responses rather than a prior decree that causes them. From that vantage the whole Augustinian-versus-Pelagian axis looks like a peculiarly Western problem generated by a peculiarly Western doctrine of the Fall.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Held Differently
Baptist, Denominations Why this is disputed. Baptists range from Calvinist to Arminian on predestination and free will; the Baptist Faith and Message affirms God's sovereign election alongside a full and free offer of the gospel, and named camps within the Baptist family read the balance differently.
Methodism, Denominations Methodism rejects unconditional election and irresistible grace. John Wesley's sermon Free Grace argued directly against the Calvinist account of predestination he had encountered through George Whitefield, holding instead that grace is offered to all and can be resisted.
Presbyterianism, Denominations Double predestination and unconditional election are confessional doctrine in this Reformed tradition, per the Canons of the Synod of Dort, First Head of Doctrine, 1619.
Methodism, Denominations The Arminian position: election is conditional on foreseen faith, and grace may be resisted.
Barth's doctrine of election reworks classical Reformed predestination Christocentrically, Christ himself as both the electing God and the elected human, a different account rather than a simple affirmation or denial of the older doctrine.
Belongs to Tradition
Predestination and election are addressed in Article XVII of the Thirty-Nine Articles, in a moderate, pastorally cautious formulation.
Ashari theology holds that human beings acquire, kasb, responsibility for acts that God alone creates, a middle position between unconstrained free will and bare compulsion.
Double predestination and unconditional election are defined doctrine per the Canons of the Synod of Dort, First Head of Doctrine, Of Divine Predestination, 1619.
The Synod of Dort sat under this church's authority between 1618 and 1619, so its canons are the church's own answer, not a borrowed one. Election is unconditional, resting on God's good pleasure and not on foreseen faith, and the canons state reprobation as a decree too, while insisting that God is in no way the author of sin. The five heads answer the Remonstrants point by point.
The Formula of Concord teaches election to salvation only. God's eternal election is a cause of the salvation of the elect, it says, but God is in no way the cause of anyone's damnation, which rests on man's own resistance to the word. That is single predestination, and it was a deliberate refusal, stated some forty years before Dort, of the double decree the Reformed churches would confess there.
Jafari theology holds neither compulsion nor total delegation, but a matter between the two, amr bayn al-amrayn, the formula attributed to Ja'far al-Sadiq himself.
The Formula of Concord, Article XI, Of Election, teaches election unto salvation as gracious and certain in Christ while explicitly rejecting the Calvinist doctrine of a parallel predestination to damnation, holding that condemnation is caused by unbelief rather than a hidden decree.
Mutazila theology affirmed unconstrained human free will, earning its early adherents the name Qadariyya, on the ground that a just God could not punish acts He himself predetermined.
Twelver Shia theology holds neither compulsion nor total delegation, but a matter between the two, amr bayn al-amrayn, a formula attributed to the sixth Imam, Ja'far al-Sadiq.
Sunni theology, in its dominant Ashari and Maturidi forms, affirms both God's prior decree and human acquisition, kasb, of responsibility for acts, a middle position between compulsion and unconstrained free will.
Positions on This Question
The Arminian position, held across most Anabaptist churches.
Arminianism taken as the answer to the same question, conditional election and a universal atonement.
The Reformed position: election is unconditional, resting on the divine decree rather than on foreseen faith.
The Eastern position, which declines the Western framing: foreknowledge is not causation, and synergy between grace and the will is assumed rather than argued.
The Eastern position, in common with the Eastern Orthodox churches.
The Arminian position, inherited through the Wesleyan and Holiness stream.
Unconditional election taken as the answer to the predestination question, against the conditional reading below.
The Tridentine settlement, which permits both the Thomist and the Molinist schools inside it and condemns neither. Grace is efficacious, and the will remains genuinely free.
Zaydi theology is Mutazili in method and holds that a human being is the real author of his own acts, since God cannot justly punish an act He alone created.
Related To
Its final canon rejects double predestination to evil even while affirming grace's priority over the will.
The Synod ruled on predestination and free will against the Remonstrant position.
Sources
1. Canons of the Second Council of Orange
Second Council of Orange, J. Thornton, 529Canons 1-25 and the concluding definitionthe holders' own accountView the Source 2. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005art. ArminianismView the Source 3. The Canons of the Synod of Dort
Synod of Dort, 1619Heads of Doctrine 1-5the holders' own accountView the Source The Baptist Faith and Message
Southern Baptist Convention, 2000Article V, God's Purpose of GraceView the Source Islamic Creeds: A Selection
The Sermons of John Wesley
An Introduction to Shi'i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi'ism
The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion
Church of England, 1571Article XVII, Of Predestination and Electionthe holders' own accountView the Source The Formula of Concord
Jakob Andreae, Martin Chemnitz, Nikolaus Selnecker and others, 1577Article XI, Of ElectionView the Source Free Methodist Church (Wikipedia)
African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church (Wikipedia)
Articles of Religion, What We Believe, The Christian Methodist Episcopal Church (thecmechurch.org)
The Christian Methodist Episcopal Church, Christian Methodist Episcopal ChurchView the Source Baptist Confessions of Faith
The Book of Discipline of the United Methodist Church
United Methodist Church, The United Methodist Publishing Housethe holders' own accountView the Source Our Beliefs, The African Methodist Episcopal Church (ame-church.com)
African Methodist Episcopal Church, African Methodist Episcopal ChurchView the Source Transitional Book of Doctrines and Discipline of the Global Methodist Church
Global Methodist Church, 2022
Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis
Luis de Molina, 1588Disputation 52, on middle knowledge
Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent
Council of Trent, 1563Session 6, canons 4-6the holders' own accountView the Source The Westminster Confession of Faith
Westminster Assembly, 1646Chapter 3, Of God's Eternal Decreethe holders' own accountView the Source Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source Essays About This Entity (1 essay)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.