Origin 988
Ukrainian Orthodoxy shares its origin with the Russian church in the 988 baptism of Kievan Rus at Kyiv. Its modern jurisdiction is genuinely contested: the Orthodox Church of Ukraine received a Tomos of Autocephaly from the Ecumenical Patriarchate in January 2019, recognized by some Orthodox churches and not by others, while the Ukrainian Orthodox Church previously under the Moscow Patriarchate declared expanded independence in 2022 on terms whose canonical status remains disputed.
History & Origin
Traces its Christian origin to the 988 baptism of Kyivan Rus under Grand Prince Vladimir, and gained recognition as an autocephalous church distinct from the Moscow Patriarchate through the Ecumenical Patriarchate's 2019 Tomos.
Facts
Attributions
Church Family Origins
Origin Period Place of OriginKyiv, capital of Kievan Rus 2 FounderNo single founder. Traces its Christian origin to the 988 baptism of Kyivan Rus under Grand Prince Vladimir. 2 History
Date of SeparationSourced to the subject's own account Trajectory
Membership Over TimeA 2022 Razumkov Centre opinion survey, reported by the Religious Information Service of Ukraine, found that 5.5 percent of Ukrainians identified themselves as faithful of the church then under the Moscow Patriarchate, against 35.2 percent identifying with the rival Orthodox Church of Ukraine. 7 Membership Over TimeSourced to the subject's own accountIn a 2008 analysis, the geopolitical research firm Stratfor estimated that more than fifty percent of the Ukrainian population belonged to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, then under the Moscow Patriarchate. 8 Membership Figure As OfSourced to the subject's own account Membership Figure As Of Basis of the Membership Figure Basis of the Membership FigureSourced to the subject's own accountScholarly or Demographic Estimate 8 Practice
Liturgical Language Law and State
Ban or Official WatchlistA 2024 Ukrainian law bans the activity of religious organisations found to be affiliated with or directed from the Russian Federation, a measure aimed principally at the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, historically linked to the Moscow Patriarchate. Ukraine's government frames the law as a wartime security measure; it has been described internationally, including by some religious freedom monitors, as raising concerns about religious persecution of the church. 6 Disputed
Separation or DivergenceTwo jurisdictions claim Ukrainian Orthodox loyalty today 3 Sourced to the subject's own accountThe Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) formed from a December 2018 unification council and received a Tomos of Autocephaly from the Ecumenical Patriarchate in January 2019; it is recognized as canonical by the churches of Constantinople, Greece, Alexandria and Cyprus. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church previously under the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP) declared expanded independence from Moscow in May 2022, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but whether this constitutes genuine autocephaly is itself disputed, since only a recognized autocephalous church or the Ecumenical Patriarchate can properly confer that status. The Moscow Patriarchate does not recognize the OCU and broke communion with Constantinople over the 2019 Tomos. This entry states both positions without adjudicating between them. Belief
Defining Doctrinal PositionTrinitarian: one God in three persons 1 Its own record shares its origin with the Russian church's 988 baptism, matching Eastern Orthodoxy, already carried as trinitarian. Defining Doctrinal PositionChalcedonian: two natures in the one person of Christ (Chalcedon, 451) 1 Its own record shares its origin with the Russian church's 988 baptism, matching Eastern Orthodoxy, already carried as chalcedonian. Defining Doctrinal PositionRejects the Filioque: the Spirit proceeds from the Father 1 Its own record shares its origin with the Russian church's 988 baptism, matching Eastern Orthodoxy, already carried as filioque-rejecting. Organisation
GovernanceSelf-governing churches under patriarchs, deciding in synod 3 Sourced to the subject's own accountEach of the two present-day jurisdictions is governed by its own synod under its own primate OrdinationMarried clergy permitted 4 An Eastern Orthodox national church sharing the 988 Kyiv baptism, per its own record. Status
Status TodayLiving tradition, practised today 5 A living tradition whose institutional jurisdiction remains actively contested In Other Languages (12 names)
- الكنيسة الأوكرانية الأرثوذكسية (بطريركية موسكو)
- Ukrainisch-Orthodoxe Kirche (Moskauer Patriarchat)
- Ουκρανική Ορθόδοξη Εκκλησία (Πατριαρχείο Μόσχας)
- Iglesia ortodoxa ucraniana (Patriarcado de Moscú)
- Église orthodoxe ukrainienne (patriarcat de Moscou)
- Gereja Ortodoks Ukraina (Patriarkat Moskwa)
- Chiesa ortodossa ucraina (Patriarcato di Mosca)
- ウクライナ正教会 (モスクワ総主教庁系)
- 우크라이나 정교회 (모스크바 총대주교청)
- Oekraïens-Orthodoxe Kerk (2022)
- Ukraiński Kościół Prawosławny Patriarchatu Moskiewskiego
- Igreja Ortodoxa Ucraniana (Patriarcado de Moscou)
Learn More
Shared Roots, Divergent Paths
Ukrainian Orthodox Christianity traces to the same 988 baptism of Kievan Rus that the Russian church claims as its own founding moment, since Kyiv, not Moscow, was the political and religious center of the Rus lands converted under Prince Vladimir. For centuries the Metropolitanate of Kyiv held a senior, largely autonomous place under the Ecumenical Patriarchate even as political power in the Rus lands shifted northward after the Mongol conquest.
In 1686 the Ecumenical Patriarchate transferred the Kyiv Metropolitanate to the jurisdiction of the Moscow Patriarchate, an act whose canonical propriety Constantinople itself later disputed, ruling in 2018 that the original transfer had been intended as temporary and improperly exercised. For the following three centuries most Ukrainian Orthodox life was administered from Moscow, though rival Ukrainian jurisdictions repeatedly asserted independence, including a short-lived Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church proclaimed in 1921 and suppressed under Soviet rule, and further autocephalous and independent bodies that formed after Ukrainian independence in 1991 but received no wide international recognition for decades.
By the early twenty-first century, Ukrainian Orthodoxy existed as several competing jurisdictions claiming the same territory and often the same parishes, a fragmentation the events described in the following article attempted, only partially, to resolve.
The 2018-2019 Tomos and Its Aftermath
In December 2018 a unification council in Kyiv merged Ukraine's previously unrecognized Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church and Kyivan Patriarchate bodies into a single new Orthodox Church of Ukraine, and on 6 January 2019 Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I granted this new church a Tomos of Autocephaly, formal recognition as an independent, self-governing church. The Ecumenical Patriarchate's own churches, along with the churches of Greece, Alexandria and Cyprus, subsequently recognized the Orthodox Church of Ukraine as canonical; the Moscow Patriarchate did not, and broke communion with Constantinople itself over the decision, a rupture other Orthodox churches have responded to differently and that remains unresolved across the Orthodox world.
The competing body, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church that had remained under Moscow's jurisdiction, declared in May 2022, following Russia's full scale invasion of Ukraine that February, that it was severing practical ties to the Moscow Patriarchate and adopting full independence. Whether this declaration constitutes genuine autocephaly, a status only a recognized autocephalous church or the Ecumenical Patriarchate can properly confer, is itself disputed: the church's own statutes and canonical relationships remain contested both within Ukraine and among outside observers, and Ukrainian civil authorities have separately moved to restrict the Moscow-linked church's legal operation. This entry describes both positions rather than adjudicating between them; the underlying dispute over recognition and canonical status remains genuinely unsettled.
A New Calendar Widens the Break With Moscow
On 27 July 2023 a Local Council of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, the body Constantinople had granted its own tomos of autocephaly in January 2019, voted to adopt the Revised Julian calendar, effective from the start of the new church year on 1 September that same year. The change moved every fixed feast thirteen days earlier: Christmas, kept for a century on the unrevised Julian date of January 7, was observed on December 25 for the first time that December, alongside the rest of the calendar's fixed observances. Parishes and monasteries that preferred to keep the old dates were told they could continue to do so, so the reform reached the church gradually rather than by decree alone.
The timing was not separate from the war. The decision followed Russia's full scale invasion in February 2022 by a little over a year, and it widened a break with Moscow that the 2019 tomos had already opened. The Julian calendar itself had come to be read in Ukraine as a marker of Russian church culture specifically, not simply of Orthodox tradition in general, and moving off it read as a further, deliberate step away from Moscow rather than as a change made for its own sake.
Where the six other Orthodox churches this atlas covers arrived at their calendar decisions across the 1920s, the Ukrainian church's decision is the newest, and its reasoning is explicitly the war.
Ukrainian Orthodox Church
Filter Results18 entries
Connections
Associated With
The Patriarchate granted autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine in 2019.
Source Tomos of Autocephaly of the Orthodox Church of UkraineEcumenical Patriarchate of Constantinoplethe holders' own account
Kyiv, Cities Kyiv is the seat of contested Orthodox jurisdictions in Ukraine.
This source names Ukrainian Orthodox Church directly: "The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA's own announcement of a general stewardship resource, promoting giving in spiritual terms with no stated percentage, due or member consequence named anywhere..."
Source New Blog: Office of Stewardship
This source names Ukrainian Orthodox Church directly: "allowing the government to ban the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate over its historical ties to the Russian Orthodox Church, and President Zelensky's signature of the bill into..."
Source Ukraine Adopts 'Historic' Law to Ban Moscow-Linked Orthodox Church (Al Jazeera)
This source names Ukrainian Orthodox Church directly: "The English Wikipedia article on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate), read 2026-08-16, quoting a 2008 Stratfor analysis estimating that more than fifty percent of the Ukrainian..."
Source Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Belongs To Church Family
Belongs to Tradition
Branch Of
Both present-day Ukrainian Orthodox jurisdictions stand within the wider Eastern Orthodox communion; only their mutual and Moscow relations are contested.
Source The Orthodox ChurchTimothy Ware (Kallistos Ware)
Governed By Polity
Holds Element
The monastery founded in the eleventh century is the oldest and most important in the Ukrainian church, and its tenancy has been the subject of legal proceedings since 2023.
The chronicle was compiled at Kyiv and the Ukrainian church reads it as the record of its own foundation, which is why the same text stands at the head of two national histories.
Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Held Differently
Znamenny Chant, Sacred Sound The Kyivan redaction grew its own melodies and was written in square notation rather than in hooks, and it is what Ukrainian parishes sing rather than the Muscovite form.
Objects and Practices of This Tradition
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The epiclesis follows the institution narrative and is held to be the moment of consecration, which is the central Eastern difference from Western eucharistic theology.
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The Lamb is broken into four particles marked IC XC NI KA, one placed in the chalice, one for the clergy and two for the communion of the people.
Source The Nicene-Constantinopolitan CreedFirst Council of Constantinoplethe holders' own account
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The Orthodox call it the Divine Liturgy, most often that of John Chrysostom, sung throughout behind an icon screen, with leavened bread and communion given in both kinds from a spoon after preparation by fasting and confession.
Source The Nicene-Constantinopolitan CreedFirst Council of Constantinoplethe holders' own account
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The institution narrative is recited within the anaphora, but the consecration is not located in it.
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Orthodoxy defended images at the seventh council and keeps them central: an icon is kissed on entering, censed, carried in procession, laid on a stand for the feast of the day, and kept in a corner of the home. It is written to a received pattern rather than invented, and generally unsigned.
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The Orthodox honour Mary as Theotokos, God-bearer, and glorify saints by decision of a synod rather than through a Roman-style process; they reject the Immaculate Conception as answering a doctrine of original sin they do not hold, while keeping the Dormition.
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The Byzantine churches reserve the Lamb through the year for it.
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Showing 101 to 117 of 117 in Objects and Practices of This Tradition, page 3 of 3.
Originates in Language
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church uses Church Slavonic liturgically alongside growing Ukrainian-language practice.
Source Service Book of the Holy Orthodox-Catholic Apostolic ChurchIsabel Florence Hapgood (compiler and translator)
Sacred to This Deity
Source The Orthodox ChurchTimothy Ware (Kallistos Ware)
Uses Liturgical Language
Sources
1. The Orthodox Church
2. The Russian Primary Chronicle (Povest vremennykh let), Laurentian Text
Anonymous (compiled at Kiev); Samuel Hazzard Cross and Olgerd P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor (trans.), Mediaeval Academy of America, 1953View the Source 3. Tomos of Autocephaly of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine
Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, 2019the holders' own account
4. Service Book of the Holy Orthodox-Catholic Apostolic Church
Isabel Florence Hapgood (compiler and translator), Houghton Mifflin, 1906View the Source 5. Law of Ukraine on the Protection of the Constitutional Order in the Field of Activities of Religious Organizations
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2024
6. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source 7. Razumkov Center: 35.2% of Ukrainians Consider Themselves Faithful of the OCU, 5.5% of the Moscow Patriarchate (RISU, 2022)
Razumkov Centre (survey), reported by RISU, Religious Information Service of Ukraine (RISU), 2022View the Source 8. Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) (Wikipedia)
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source Open Questions (1 open question)
Does the Ukrainian Orthodox Church Hold a Formal Personal Member Giving Obligation?
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church's jurisdiction is genuinely contested (the Orthodox Church of Ukraine under the 2019 Tomos of Autocephaly against the church previously under the Moscow Patriarchate), and no single source found across two bands establishes a giving norm for either reading of it. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA's own institutional announcement of a general stewardship resource promotes giving only in general spiritual terms, "the deep spiritual roots of Orthodox stewardship", with no stated percentage, due or consequence for a member who does not give, distinct from the codified due-with-consequences shape already recorded on this axis for Serbian and Armenian parish practice.
What would resolve this A primary source from a specific Ukrainian Orthodox jurisdiction (the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA, or the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada) stating a specific dues, pledge or tithe structure and what follows, if anything, when a member does not meet it; or a scholarly study of Ukrainian Orthodox parish finance addressing member giving specifically.
Slavic Orthodox studies, primary source review of Ukrainian Orthodox jurisdictional financeNew Blog: Office of Stewardship
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.