The 1995 AIR Review of Remote Viewing, Studies
Standing
Concerns Notable Publication
Currently States Utts, An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning, and Hyman, Evaluation of Program on Anomalous Mental Phenomena, both republished in the Journal of Scientific Exploration in 1996
The American Institutes for Research commissioned Jessica Utts and Ray Hyman, statisticians with opposite prior positions on the reality of psi, to review the same body of government-funded remote viewing research under a 1995 Central Intelligence Agency contract. Utts's report concluded the effect was statistically real and worth further study; Hyman's report, reviewing the identical experiments and statistics, concluded flaws in the underlying protocols were sufficient to explain the results without invoking psi, and each report was published with a short reply addressing the other's specific objections rather than a joint reconciliation. The method on both sides was statistical meta-analysis of the same published experimental record, so the disagreement is one of interpretation rather than of access to different evidence. Because both reports and both replies remain in print exactly as submitted, the AIR review is a documented case of two qualified reviewers reaching opposite conclusions from one shared data set, which is why it stands as a debated notable publication rather than a settled verdict either way.
Source An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning, Jessica Utts