Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,315 statements marked Debated.

Te Kooti Arikirangi Te Turuki, Lifespan or Floruit End Year1893

Te Kooti Arikirangi Te Turuki, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 1893

The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand, Manatu Taonga, New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage

Te Whiti o Rongomai, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year1830

Te Whiti o Rongomai, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 1830

The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand, Manatu Taonga, New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage

Te Whiti o Rongomai, Lifespan or Floruit End Year1907

Te Whiti o Rongomai, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 1907

The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand, Manatu Taonga, New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage

Tecuilhuitontli, Approximate Gregorian SpanEarly to late June

Tecuilhuitontli, Veintenas

Standing

Concerns Approximate Gregorian Span

Currently States Early to late June

Scholars have proposed several correlations between the xiuhpohualli year and the Gregorian calendar. The month range given here follows one widely reproduced reconstruction and is offered for relative placement only, not as a settled date: the 365 day count carried no intercalated leap day, so its alignment with the solar year is understood to have drifted across the centuries of its use, and colonial era testimony was recorded decades after the practice had ended.

Source The Aztecs (Smith, 3rd edition), Michael E. Smith

Tekle Haymanot, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year1215

Tekle Haymanot, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 1215

The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church's traditional chronology gives this year; it is hagiographic tradition rather than an independently established date, matching the same reasoning already recorded for the legendary elaboration of his life.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Tekle Haymanot, Lifespan or Floruit End Year1313

Tekle Haymanot, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 1313

The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church's traditional chronology gives this year; it is hagiographic tradition rather than an independently established date, matching the same reasoning already recorded for the legendary elaboration of his life.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Telepathy, Replication StatusThe 1986 Hyman-Honorton joint communique agreed ganzfeld results were not attributable to chance or selective reporting alone but left open whether they demonstrated psi; later large replications have not settled the question.

Telepathy, Psi Phenomena

Standing

Concerns Replication Status

Currently States The 1986 Hyman-Honorton joint communique agreed ganzfeld results were not attributable to chance or selective reporting alone but left open whether they demonstrated psi; later large replications have not settled the question.

Ray Hyman and Charles Honorton's 1986 joint communique on the ganzfeld controversy set out the standards a telepathy experiment would need to meet to be accepted as a controlled positive result by both a proponent and a skeptical reviewer working from the same data. J. B. Rhine's original 1930s and 1940s Duke card-guessing trials, the first large-scale laboratory telepathy program, and the ganzfeld studies that followed it are both cited in that literature, and the 1986 communique itself records that no single result had, to that point, been accepted as conclusive by both parapsychologists and mainstream psychologists reviewing the same study. The method throughout is controlled experimental replication under progressively tightened protocols, each round intended to close a specific objection the previous round had raised. Because later meta-analyses applying the communique's own standards have continued to disagree over which studies qualify for inclusion, no independent replication of telepathy has since been accepted as conclusive by both sides, which is why the replication status remains disputed.

Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversy, Ray Hyman, Charles Honorton

Temperance, Origin PeriodTwo dates fold into this entry. The four cardinal virtues are named in Plato's Republic in the fourth century BCE, taken up by Aristotle and the Stoics, and given the name cardinal only later, by Ambrose of Milan in the late fourth century CE. Temperance's place as a contrary virtue against gluttony follows the later Psychomachia of Prudentius, written around 400 CE, though in the poem itself Sobrietas overthrows Luxuria, lust, not gluttony; the gluttony pairing was fixed only in the later medieval lists.

Temperance, Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Two dates fold into this entry. The four cardinal virtues are named in Plato's Republic in the fourth century BCE, taken up by Aristotle and the Stoics, and given the name cardinal only later, by Ambrose of Milan in the late fourth century CE. Temperance's place as a contrary virtue against gluttony follows the later Psychomachia of Prudentius, written around 400 CE, though in the poem itself Sobrietas overthrows Luxuria, lust, not gluttony; the gluttony pairing was fixed only in the later medieval lists.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Temple Elephants, Standing as a Comparative CategoryUsed, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed

Temple Elephants, Practices

Standing

Concerns Standing as a Comparative Category

Currently States Used, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed

The practice of keeping elephants for temple ceremony and procession, concentrated above all in Kerala temples, is used in the atlas as a comparative category for animal use in ritual, but its standing is disputed because temple authorities and animal welfare advocates hold genuinely opposed positions on whether the practice, even properly regulated, can be reconciled with animal welfare at all. Temple authorities and many devotees hold that regulated captivity and ceremonial use are compatible with the animals' wellbeing and are integral to the temple's ritual life. Welfare advocates, citing documented conditions in individual temples, hold that captivity itself, whatever the regulation, cannot meet a wild animal's needs and that the ceremonial role is not a sufficient justification. The disagreement is a values dispute about what counts as acceptable treatment rather than a disagreement over the facts of how the elephants are kept, which is why regulation has narrowed but not ended it.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Temple Elephants, Scholarly Standing DetailSubject to sustained, documented animal welfare concern; Kerala state regulation attempts to set minimum captive elephant welfare standards

Temple Elephants, Practices

Standing

Concerns Scholarly Standing Detail

Currently States Subject to sustained, documented animal welfare concern; Kerala state regulation attempts to set minimum captive elephant welfare standards

Kerala, where the largest concentration of temple elephants is kept, has adopted state regulation setting minimum standards for captive elephant welfare, covering matters such as chaining duration, rest periods and veterinary care, in direct response to sustained and documented welfare concern raised by advocacy organisations and reported in individual cases of mistreatment or elephant deaths during festival processions. The regulation itself is evidence that the welfare concern is treated as substantive by the relevant state authority rather than as an outside objection to a settled local matter, but it has not resolved the underlying disagreement recorded above: welfare advocates hold that the standards are inconsistently enforced and that no standard removes the basic problem of keeping a wild animal in temple captivity, while temple authorities hold that regulated compliance answers the concern. Whether enforcement is adequate is itself disputed and is a matter for ongoing monitoring rather than one that has been settled.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Temple Endowment, Historical OriginThe relationship between the endowment and Freemasonry, which Joseph Smith joined weeks before first administering it, is genuinely disputed. The church acknowledges shared vocabulary and structure while holding the content to be restored; most historians outside the movement read the borrowing as more substantial.

Temple Endowment, Rituals

Standing

Concerns Historical Origin

Currently States The relationship between the endowment and Freemasonry, which Joseph Smith joined weeks before first administering it, is genuinely disputed. The church acknowledges shared vocabulary and structure while holding the content to be restored; most historians outside the movement read the borrowing as more substantial.

According To The Latter Day Saint movement

Source The Oxford Handbook of Mormonism, Terryl L. Givens and Philip L. Barlow (eds.)

Templo Mayor, Reported FigureColonial-era accounts give totals in the tens of thousands for the dedication of the enlarged temple in 1487.

Templo Mayor, Sacred Sites

Standing

Concerns Reported Figure

Currently States Colonial-era accounts give totals in the tens of thousands for the dedication of the enlarged temple in 1487.

According To Colonial Spanish and Nahua sources

The atlas does not repeat a specific number here, because the numbers in circulation cannot be traced to a count. They appear in narratives compiled after the conquest, in some cases decades after the event described, and modern estimates built on them differ by more than an order of magnitude. That the dedication involved mass sacrifice is not the disputed part; how many people is.

Source The Great Temple of the Aztecs, Eduardo Matos Moctezuma

Tendai, Defining Doctrinal PositionBuddhahood realised in this very body and lifetime

Tendai, Denominations

Standing

Concerns Defining Doctrinal Position

Currently States Buddhahood realised in this very body and lifetime

Tendai claims it on the authority of the Lotus Sutra; Shingon claims it on the authority of the esoteric texts and by a ritual method. The two schools argued the question directly from the ninth century and have not agreed since.

Source The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, Robert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr.

Tengrism as a Modern Name, Point in DisputeWhether Tengrism is an invention of tradition, a modern construction assembled out of folklore and scholarship serving an argument about who a people are, or the surfacing of practice that had never stopped and was given a name because it needed one in order to be defended in public. Both are argued in print, and the difference bears on whether Tengrism should be described as an ancient religion at all.

Tengrism as a Modern Name, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States Whether Tengrism is an invention of tradition, a modern construction assembled out of folklore and scholarship serving an argument about who a people are, or the surfacing of practice that had never stopped and was given a name because it needed one in order to be defended in public. Both are argued in print, and the difference bears on whether Tengrism should be described as an ancient religion at all.

Source Religious revival, nationalism and the invention of tradition: political Tengrism in Central Asia and Tatarstan, Marlene Laruelle

Teotleco, Approximate Gregorian SpanMid to late September

Teotleco, Veintenas

Standing

Concerns Approximate Gregorian Span

Currently States Mid to late September

Scholars have proposed several correlations between the xiuhpohualli year and the Gregorian calendar. The month range given here follows one widely reproduced reconstruction and is offered for relative placement only, not as a settled date: the 365 day count carried no intercalated leap day, so its alignment with the solar year is understood to have drifted across the centuries of its use, and colonial era testimony was recorded decades after the practice had ended.

Source The Aztecs (Smith, 3rd edition), Michael E. Smith

Tepeilhuitl, Approximate Gregorian SpanLate September into mid October

Tepeilhuitl, Veintenas

Standing

Concerns Approximate Gregorian Span

Currently States Late September into mid October

Scholars have proposed several correlations between the xiuhpohualli year and the Gregorian calendar. The month range given here follows one widely reproduced reconstruction and is offered for relative placement only, not as a settled date: the 365 day count carried no intercalated leap day, so its alignment with the solar year is understood to have drifted across the centuries of its use, and colonial era testimony was recorded decades after the practice had ended.

Source The Aztecs (Smith, 3rd edition), Michael E. Smith

Tertullian, How Its Legacy Is ContestedWhether he formally left the church at Carthage for the New Prophecy, and whether a separate body of Tertullianists ever existed, rests on a single passage in Augustine and is read in opposite ways.

Tertullian, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns How Its Legacy Is Contested

Currently States Whether he formally left the church at Carthage for the New Prophecy, and whether a separate body of Tertullianists ever existed, rests on a single passage in Augustine and is read in opposite ways.

Timothy D. Barnes's Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study (Clarendon Press, 1971) examines the ancient evidence, chiefly Jerome's later claim, for Tertullian's association with and eventual break from the mainstream church over the New Prophecy (Montanist) movement. Barnes's method is historical and philological, reading Tertullian's own later writings for their tone toward the established church against Jerome's explicit claim of formal schism, and finds scholars split into named camps: some accept Jerome's account and read a formal break with the Carthaginian church, while others hold Tertullian's New Prophecy sympathies operated as a rigorist current inside the existing African church rather than as a separate sect he left it for.

Source Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study, Timothy D. Barnes

Tertullian, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year155

Tertullian, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 155

The source states neither date is fixed, giving these years as approximate estimates.

Source Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study, Timothy D. Barnes

Tertullian, Lifespan or Floruit End Year220

Tertullian, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 220

The source states neither date is fixed, giving these years as approximate estimates.

Source Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study, Timothy D. Barnes

Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, HistoricityHistoricity debated

Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, Scriptures & Texts

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States Historicity debated

Scholars disagree on how much of the surviving Greek text reflects a genuinely Jewish original versus later Christian composition or interpolation; the question is unresolved and treated as a live debate rather than a settled matter.

Source The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, Volume 1 (Charlesworth), James H. Charlesworth (editor)