Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, Religions
Standing
Concerns Point in Dispute
Currently States Whether Pastafarianism is best read as a genuine, if unconventional, religion or as a parody that borrows religious form without religious content, and whether that distinction is even the right question to ask of it.
Camp one, following Carole Cusack's Invented Religions and the movement's own record of adherents pursuing sincere legal recognition, marriage rites and identity claims, treats Pastafarianism as functionally similar to other invented religions that scholarship already accepts as real for at least some of their adherents, in the same category as Discordianism and the Church of the SubGenius. Camp two, represented by the courts that have actually ruled on the question, most explicitly Poland's Supreme Administrative Court in 2018 and the Dutch Council of State the same year, holds that the movement was founded to mock religious belief rather than to profess it, and that its own satirical self-presentation is itself the evidence against treating it as a religion in the legal sense. Both camps read the same facts: Henderson's letter was written as protest satire, and a real population of people has since organized around it in ways that look, by their own account, like sincere religious practice. Neither this atlas nor the courts that have ruled resolve which reading is correct; New Zealand's marriage-celebrant recognition and the Netherlands' and Poland's refusals stand as contradictory answers from different states applying different legal tests to the identical set of facts.
Source Invented Religions: Imagination, Fiction and Faith, Carole M. Cusack