Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,315 statements marked Debated.

Parsi Zoroastrianism, Origin Period Start Year700

Parsi Zoroastrianism, Denominations

Standing

Concerns Origin Period Start Year

Currently States 700

John R. Hinnells's The Zoroastrian Diaspora: Religion and Migration, Oxford University Press, 2005, traces what is known of the Parsi migration to the Qissa-i Sanjan, a Persian narrative poem composed in the sixteenth century that recounts events it presents as several centuries older. Hinnells's source-critical method treats that gap between composition and claimed event as the central problem: because no contemporary, independent record corroborates the migration, and the poem itself is the earliest surviving account, historians working from it alone have proposed arrival dates in Gujarat ranging from the eighth century to the tenth, and nothing outside the poem narrows that range further.

Source The Zoroastrian Diaspora: Religion and Migration, John R. Hinnells

Parsi Zoroastrianism, Origin Period End Year1000

Parsi Zoroastrianism, Denominations

Standing

Concerns Origin Period End Year

Currently States 1000

John R. Hinnells's The Zoroastrian Diaspora: Religion and Migration, Oxford University Press, 2005, traces what is known of the Parsi migration to the Qissa-i Sanjan, a Persian narrative poem composed in the sixteenth century that recounts events it presents as several centuries older. Hinnells's source-critical method treats that gap between composition and claimed event as the central problem: because no contemporary, independent record corroborates the migration, and the poem itself is the earliest surviving account, historians working from it alone have proposed arrival dates in Gujarat ranging from the eighth century to the tenth, and nothing outside the poem narrows that range further.

Source The Zoroastrian Diaspora: Religion and Migration, John R. Hinnells

Parthian Empire, Notable DevelopmentA Roman mystery cult of Mithras spread through the empire from the first century CE, and ancient and some modern writers traced its imagery to a Parthian or wider Persian origin, a derivation later scholarship has treated more critically.

Parthian Empire, Historical Periods

Standing

Concerns Notable Development

Currently States A Roman mystery cult of Mithras spread through the empire from the first century CE, and ancient and some modern writers traced its imagery to a Parthian or wider Persian origin, a derivation later scholarship has treated more critically.

Source The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries, David Ulansey

Partition of India, Religious DimensionWhether the killing that accompanied Partition is best understood as fundamentally religious violence, or as the product of a specific and catastrophic political and administrative failure in 1947 in which religious community supplied the line the violence organized along rather than its deeper cause, is a genuinely disputed question among historians. Ian Talbot and Gurharpal Singh's standard modern history documents the violence's deliberately targeted, religiously coded character in detail: massacres, abductions and forced conversions were directed at religious out-groups specifically, by killers who generally knew exactly which community their victims belonged to. Ayesha Jalal's influential revisionist history locates the deeper cause elsewhere, in the failure of elite political bargaining among the Indian National Congress, the Muslim League and the departing British administration, of which the mass violence was, on this reading, a catastrophic and largely unintended consequence rather than the expression of a religious antagonism ordinary Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs had been building toward for generations. The two readings are not simply opposed: even scholars emphasizing elite political failure do not deny the violence was organized along, and targeted at, religious lines; the disagreement is over how much explanatory weight that religious targeting itself deserves against the specific political and administrative collapse of 1947.

Partition of India, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Religious Dimension

Currently States Whether the killing that accompanied Partition is best understood as fundamentally religious violence, or as the product of a specific and catastrophic political and administrative failure in 1947 in which religious community supplied the line the violence organized along rather than its deeper cause, is a genuinely disputed question among historians. Ian Talbot and Gurharpal Singh's standard modern history documents the violence's deliberately targeted, religiously coded character in detail: massacres, abductions and forced conversions were directed at religious out-groups specifically, by killers who generally knew exactly which community their victims belonged to. Ayesha Jalal's influential revisionist history locates the deeper cause elsewhere, in the failure of elite political bargaining among the Indian National Congress, the Muslim League and the departing British administration, of which the mass violence was, on this reading, a catastrophic and largely unintended consequence rather than the expression of a religious antagonism ordinary Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs had been building toward for generations. The two readings are not simply opposed: even scholars emphasizing elite political failure do not deny the violence was organized along, and targeted at, religious lines; the disagreement is over how much explanatory weight that religious targeting itself deserves against the specific political and administrative collapse of 1947.

Source Ian Talbot and Gurharpal Singh, The Partition of India (2009), Ian Talbot and Gurharpal Singh

Partition of India, Death Toll Minimum180000.000000

Partition of India, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Minimum

Currently States 180000.000000

Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian's peer-reviewed demographic study compares district-level census data by religion before and after 1947 to estimate the population Partition's violence and displacement left unaccounted for, and reports estimates of the number killed between March 1947 and January 1948 ranging from roughly 180,000 to 1,000,000, a range this atlas adopts as its recorded bound because it rests on named census methodology rather than contemporary press estimate or partisan claim. The commonly repeated claim of up to two million dead traces in the general literature to no comparably rigorous named study and is not recorded here, the same discipline this axis applies elsewhere to Reconquista's untraceable seven million figure.

Source Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian, "The Big March: Migratory Flows after the Partition of India" (2008), Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian

Partition of India, Death Toll Maximum1000000.000000

Partition of India, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 1000000.000000

See death-toll-min. The historian Yasmin Khan's independently derived narrative estimate of at least one million dead sits at this same upper bound, which is why this atlas treats 1,000,000 as the documented ceiling rather than the far higher figures repeated in some popular accounts without a named rigorous source behind them.

Source Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian, "The Big March: Migratory Flows after the Partition of India" (2008), Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian

Partition of India, Death Toll AssessmentPrashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian's peer-reviewed demographic study, comparing district-level census data by religion before and after 1947, is the recorded range, roughly 180,000 to 1,000,000 killed between March 1947 and January 1948, on the strength of its named census methodology; historian Yasmin Khan's independently derived narrative estimate of at least one million converges on the same upper bound, which this atlas treats as the documented ceiling. The commonly repeated claim of up to two million dead traces in the general literature to no comparably rigorous named study and is not recorded here, the same discipline this axis applies elsewhere to Reconquista's untraceable seven million figure. Partition's violence is documented as running directly along the Hindu, Muslim and Sikh communal lines the new borders were drawn to separate, though historians including Khan emphasise that displacement, administrative collapse and opportunistic score-settling drove much of the killing alongside communal animus specifically.

Partition of India, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Assessment

Currently States Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian's peer-reviewed demographic study, comparing district-level census data by religion before and after 1947, is the recorded range, roughly 180,000 to 1,000,000 killed between March 1947 and January 1948, on the strength of its named census methodology; historian Yasmin Khan's independently derived narrative estimate of at least one million converges on the same upper bound, which this atlas treats as the documented ceiling. The commonly repeated claim of up to two million dead traces in the general literature to no comparably rigorous named study and is not recorded here, the same discipline this axis applies elsewhere to Reconquista's untraceable seven million figure. Partition's violence is documented as running directly along the Hindu, Muslim and Sikh communal lines the new borders were drawn to separate, though historians including Khan emphasise that displacement, administrative collapse and opportunistic score-settling drove much of the killing alongside communal animus specifically.

Source Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian, "The Big March: Migratory Flows after the Partition of India" (2008), Prashant Bharadwaj, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Atif Mian

Passion Play, Origin Year965

Passion Play, Performance Works

Standing

Concerns Origin Year

Currently States 965

The passion play as a fully staged vernacular drama of Christ's suffering and death took its familiar civic form only in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, but its formal root is usually traced to the Latin liturgical trope Quem Quaeritis, a brief sung dialogue dramatizing the three Marys at Christ's tomb, first recorded with performance directions around 965 to 975 in the Regularis Concordia, the customary compiled for English Benedictine monasteries under Bishop Aethelwold of Winchester. Scholars distinguish that early liturgical seed from the later civic passion play proper, and Oberammergau's own well documented tradition, the genre's most famous living instance, begins centuries afterward in 1633.

Source Young, The Drama of the Medieval Church, Karl Young

Patanjali, HistoricityHistoricity debated

Patanjali, Figures

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States Historicity debated

Patanjali is the name tradition attaches to the Yoga Sutras, but almost nothing reliable is known of the person behind it. Indian tradition has long identified this Patanjali with a grammarian of the same name from a different era, an identification modern scholarship generally rejects, and the Yoga Sutras' own date is argued across several centuries with no inscription or external record settling it. The Encyclopedia of Hinduism (Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York, eds., 2008) treats the name as a compilational marker for a text tradition rather than a securely dated individual, which is why the historicity here is carried as debated rather than as a settled biography.

Source Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York (eds.)

Patanjali, Historicity DetailEncyclopedia of Hinduism (Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York, eds., Routledge, 2008) records that almost nothing reliable is known of the person behind the Yoga Sutras: whether a single author named Patanjali composed the whole four chapter work or whether it is a compilation from different hands, and whether that author is the same Patanjali as the Sanskrit grammarian of the same name Indian tradition has long identified him with, are all open questions modern scholarship treats separately rather than resolving.

Patanjali, Figures

Standing

Concerns Historicity Detail

Currently States Encyclopedia of Hinduism (Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York, eds., Routledge, 2008) records that almost nothing reliable is known of the person behind the Yoga Sutras: whether a single author named Patanjali composed the whole four chapter work or whether it is a compilation from different hands, and whether that author is the same Patanjali as the Sanskrit grammarian of the same name Indian tradition has long identified him with, are all open questions modern scholarship treats separately rather than resolving.

Source Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York (eds.)

Patience, Origin PeriodPatience's literary ancestor is the Psychomachia of Prudentius, written around 400 CE, where Patientia outlasts and defeats Ira in the poem's longest single combat. The formal pairing of patience against wrath as one of the seven contrary virtues was fixed only later, in medieval catechetical teaching with no single author or date.

Patience, Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Patience's literary ancestor is the Psychomachia of Prudentius, written around 400 CE, where Patientia outlasts and defeats Ira in the poem's longest single combat. The formal pairing of patience against wrath as one of the seven contrary virtues was fixed only later, in medieval catechetical teaching with no single author or date.

Source The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept, with Special Reference to Medieval English Literature, Morton W. Bloomfield

Patrick, Lifespan or FloruitPatrick's activity is dated only broadly, to the fifth century, since no strictly contemporary record fixes it more closely; his own surviving writing, the Confessio, supplies his own account of his life but not an exact chronology. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) gives this broad floruit rather than the more precise dates later medieval tradition supplies.

Patrick, Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit

Currently States Patrick's activity is dated only broadly, to the fifth century, since no strictly contemporary record fixes it more closely; his own surviving writing, the Confessio, supplies his own account of his life but not an exact chronology. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) gives this broad floruit rather than the more precise dates later medieval tradition supplies.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Patrick, Lifespan or FloruitLater medieval tradition supplies two specific death dates for Patrick, 461 and 493, thirty two years apart, and the Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) records both as disputed rather than endorsing either, consistent with its broader dating of his activity only to the fifth century in general.

Patrick, Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit

Currently States Later medieval tradition supplies two specific death dates for Patrick, 461 and 493, thirty two years apart, and the Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd revised edition, Cross and Livingstone, eds., Oxford University Press, 2005) records both as disputed rather than endorsing either, consistent with its broader dating of his activity only to the fifth century in general.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Patrick's Mission to Ireland, End Year493

Patrick's Mission to Ireland, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 493

Patrick's own death, which closes the mission this event traces, is disputed between 461 or 462 and 492 or 493; the later range is carried here. Unlike Palladius's securely attested 431 CE mission, no contemporary record fixed Patrick's death: both ranges rest on retrospective annalistic reckoning written centuries afterward, and the dispute itself remains unresolved (T.M. Charles-Edwards, Early Christian Ireland, Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Source Early Christian Ireland, T.M. Charles-Edwards

Pauline Missions Through Asia Minor and Greece, Start Year46

Pauline Missions Through Asia Minor and Greece, Spread Events

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 46

The chronology of Paul's three missionary journeys is reconstructed from a single fixed external anchor rather than any contemporary calendar of its own: an inscription from Delphi datable to 51 or 52 CE places the proconsul Gallio, before whom Acts records Paul appearing at Corinth, in that year. Working backward from that one fixed point, the first journey's start is conventionally placed around the mid-40s CE, but the precise year is not independently attested.

Source The New Testament, Acts of the Apostles, Anonymous

Pausanias, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year110

Pausanias, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 110

The source calls these years approximate, inferred from internal references rather than a direct record.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Pausanias, Lifespan or Floruit End Year180

Pausanias, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 180

The source calls these years approximate, inferred from internal references rather than a direct record.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Pax, Meaning in the Attesting SourceUsually glossed as planting time, and sometimes connected to a drum, the two readings resting on different derivations.

Pax, Haab Months

Standing

Concerns Meaning in the Attesting Source

Currently States Usually glossed as planting time, and sometimes connected to a drum, the two readings resting on different derivations.

Because the Haab carried no leap-day correction, an agricultural sense in a month name would have drifted out of alignment with the true planting season within a few generations, which is one reason this gloss is treated cautiously.

Source Relacion de las cosas de Yucatan, Diego de Landa

Payt (Pha) ጰ, Meaning in the Attesting SourceWhy the script was vocalised in the fourth century CE, after centuries of writing consonants alone, is argued and not settled

Payt (Pha) ጰ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Meaning in the Attesting Source

Currently States Why the script was vocalised in the fourth century CE, after centuries of writing consonants alone, is argued and not settled

According To The Ge'ez script

The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996) reviews the Aksumite inscriptions that first show Ge'ez written with vocalisation, a fourth-century CE innovation that is not in dispute, and canvasses three explanations for why it happened then: an internal development inside the Aksumite royal chancery seeking a more precise script for administration; a response to the newly Christian court's need for scripture translated and taught with unambiguous vowels after Aksum's conversion under King Ezana; and influence carried by vocalised Indian scripts reaching the Aksumite court through Red Sea trade contact. Comparing the timing, the epigraphic evidence and the trade record for each explanation, the volume's contributors find none conclusive, since Aksum's fourth-century contacts touched all three at once; the dating of the change is settled, its cause is not.

Source The World's Writing Systems, Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Peacock, Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThe words spirit animal and totem are used in popular Western practice for a personal animal ally. Native scholars and communities object to both usages, on the ground that they take the vocabulary and the authority of particular Indigenous traditions and apply them to a generic and commercial practice.

Peacock, Animals & Totems

Standing

Concerns Contested or Appropriated Modern Use

Currently States The words spirit animal and totem are used in popular Western practice for a personal animal ally. Native scholars and communities object to both usages, on the ground that they take the vocabulary and the authority of particular Indigenous traditions and apply them to a generic and commercial practice.

Suzanne Owen's The Appropriation of Native American Spirituality (Continuum, 2008) documents the objection Indigenous communities in North America raise, ongoing and in the present tense, against the commercial "spirit animal" genre. Owen's study examines how the practice borrows specific Indigenous terms and claimed lineages, presenting them as licensing a service sold to outside customers, and sets that use against the communities' own accounts of what those terms and practices mean within their traditions. What is disputed, on Owen's reading, is not that people generally feel a kinship with animals, a widely attested feeling that belongs to no one tradition, but the specific commercial borrowing of Indigenous vocabulary and claimed authority. The atlas records the animal, records that the modern commercial practice exists, and records that this documented objection is made, without adjudicating between the parties.

Source The Appropriation of Native American Spirituality, Suzanne Owen