Doctrines
Frashokereti
Last Things
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1200 BCE to 600 BCE
Frashokereti, "making wonderful," is the Zoroastrian doctrine of the final renovation: the culmination of cosmic history when the long struggle between good and evil ends in the total victory of Ahura Mazda. The developed teaching describes a resurrection of the dead, a universal judgement in which a river of molten metal separates and finally purifies all souls, the defeat and abolition of Angra Mainyu and death, and the restoration of the whole creation to a deathless, perfect and eternal state. A saviour figure, the Saoshyant, born of the prophet's line, is expected to bring it about. Frashokereti gives Zoroastrian time its characteristic shape, linear, moving toward a good end rather than cycling, and its eschatology, including bodily resurrection and a final purgation, is widely thought to have influenced later Jewish, Christian and Islamic expectation.
Facts
Position Profile
Earliest FormulationSourced to the subject's own accountThe Avesta itself contains only allusions to frashokereti's eschatological events; the fullest surviving account is the Bundahishn, compiled around the ninth century CE, which describes the final battle between the yazatas and the daevas, the resurrection of the dead in their original bodies, and a river of molten metal that flows like warm milk for the righteous and burns the wicked. 2 Key TextSourced to the subject's own accountIn the Bundahishn's account, the saoshyant leads humanity through a final ordeal by molten metal before the yazatas Airyaman and Atar melt the metal in the hills and mountains; the doctrine closes with a final yasna ceremony at which the drinking of parahaoma confers immortality on the righteous. 2 Status
Status Within the TraditionStandard teaching, not formally defined 1 The Zoroastrian doctrine of the final restoration of the world. A defining eschatological teaching Structure
StructureZoroastrian tradition divides the span of cosmic history into twelve thousand years across four periods of three thousand years each: an age of purely spiritual existence, the material creation before Angra Mainyu's onslaught, the age of mixture in which good and evil contend, and a final period, beginning with Zoroaster, in which three future saviours are born a thousand years apart until frashokereti closes it. 3 Tradition
Scriptural BasisThe term frasho.kereti already occurs in the Gathas, the oldest layer of the Avesta attributed to Zoroaster himself, at Yasna 30.9, and is developed further across the younger Avesta's Yashts before reaching its fullest narrative treatment in the Bundahishn. 4 Origins
Origin Period Belief
Defining Doctrinal PositionSourced to the subject's own accountZoroastrian tradition holds frashokereti to four premises: that good ultimately prevails over evil, that the world was created perfect before being corrupted by Angra Mainyu, that the corruption will be undone and the world restored, and that each individual's part in that restoration depends solely on the sum of their own thoughts, words and deeds. 2 Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteSourced to the subject's own accountThe historian of religion Mary Boyce, writing in 1979, argued that frashokereti describes a restoration to original perfection rather than a return to primordial uniformity, since the variety of Ahura Mazda's creation, its plants, animals and peoples, is understood to persist eternally rather than being erased. 2 Learn More
Making the World Wonderful Again
Zoroastrian time runs toward an end, and that end is frashokereti, literally the "making wonderful", the final renovation in which the battle between good and evil is decided for ever in favour of Ahura Mazda. The later texts fill in the scene. The dead are raised; a universal judgement follows in which a flood of molten metal sweeps over all, searing the wicked yet felt by the righteous as warm milk, and purifying everyone so that none is finally lost. Angra Mainyu and death itself are destroyed, and the whole creation is remade deathless, perfect and unchanging.
A saviour, the Saoshyant, born miraculously from the seed of Zarathustra, is awaited as the one who brings this about. Two things make the doctrine important beyond Zoroastrianism. It gives the tradition a linear rather than cyclical view of history, moving toward a good conclusion. And its features, bodily resurrection, a last judgement, a final purgation and renewal, are widely held to have shaped the eschatologies of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
Three Saviours, Not Only One
Article one names the Saoshyant as the saviour figure of frashokereti, "born miraculously from the seed of Zarathustra," without setting out how that lineage is actually structured in the fuller Zoroastrian texts. The developed tradition does not describe a single such figure but a sequence of three, spaced across a very long span of time, and the detail matters for how the doctrine compares with later messianic expectation elsewhere.
Pahlavi texts describe Zarathustra's seed as preserved miraculously in a lake, Lake Kansaoya, from which three virgin mothers will in turn conceive three sons at intervals of a thousand years: Ushedar, Ushedarmah, and finally the Saoshyant himself, each renewing the world further and the last completing the renovation article one describes. The structure gives Zoroastrian eschatology a staged, escalating shape rather than a single decisive intervention, three successive deliverers rather than one, each preparing for the next.
Article one notes, cautiously, that Zoroastrian eschatology is "widely thought to have influenced" later Jewish, Christian and Islamic expectation; the three-saviour structure is one of the more specific points where that comparison has been pressed, since ideas of a forerunner preceding a final deliverer appear in some Second Temple Jewish and early Christian material as well. The dating of the Pahlavi sources that spell out the three-Saoshyant scheme in this detail is considerably later than the Gathas themselves, which makes the direction and extent of any influence, as opposed to independent development of a similar staged expectation, a question specialists continue to debate rather than one this comparison can settle on its own.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
The final renovation of the world, when evil is defeated and creation restored to perfection, is Zoroastrian eschatology held by this community.
The final renovation of the world, when evil is defeated and creation restored to perfection, is Zoroastrian eschatology held by this community.
Related To
The Saoshyant is the figure whose coming brings about frashokereti, the final renovation; the doctrine of the renovation and the doctrine of its saviour are recorded as two related but separate entries.
Sources
1. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005s.v. FrashokeretiView the Source 2. Frashokereti (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia, 2026on the Bundahishn's ninth century account of the final ordealView the Source 2. Frashokereti (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia, 2026on the saoshyant, the molten ordeal and the final yasnaView the Source 2. Frashokereti (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia, 2026on Mary Boyce's 1979 reading of restoration versus uniformityView the Source 2. Frashokereti (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia, 2026on the doctrine's four core premisesView the Source 3. A History of Zoroastrianism
4. Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Mary Boyce (ed. and trans.), Manchester University Press, 1984Yasna 30.9View the Source The Bundahishn: The Zoroastrian Book of Creation
Domenico Agostini and Samuel Thrope, Oxford University Press, 2020On the final renovation and the raising of the dead
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.