Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Gemilut Hasadim

Also Known As Gemilut chasadim · acts of lovingkindnessOriginal Term gemilut chasadim (Hebrew, the bestowal of kindnesses)
Sin, Grace and the Human Condition

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 100 to 220 CE

The Mishnah names this as one of the three things on which the world stands, alongside Torah and the Temple service, and the rabbis drew a careful distinction from almsgiving: money can only be given to the poor and only from the living, while personal kindness can be shown to anyone and can be extended to the dead. That last case, attending to a body that cannot repay, is called the kindness of truth and is treated as the purest form because no reciprocity is possible. The category is not a sentiment but a set of specified obligations with defined halakhic contours, and much of Jewish communal infrastructure (burial societies, sick visitation, free loan funds, wedding provision for those who cannot afford it), exists to discharge it institutionally rather than leaving it to individual initiative.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
100 to 220 CE 1
Held By
Judaism 1
Origin Period
Pirkei Avot 1:2 makes it one of the three pillars on which the world stands 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1Tradition: Judaism
One of the three pillars on which the world stands, in Pirkei Avot 1:2
Learn More
Acts of Kindness, and How They Differ from Charity

Gemilut hasadim, the bestowing of lovingkindness, is the rabbinic category for personal acts of care. The Mishnah places it among the three things on which the world stands, Torah, service, and acts of lovingkindness (Avot 1:2), and lists it among the deeds that have no fixed measure, whose fruits a person enjoys in this world while the principal remains for the world to come, a passage recited in the daily morning liturgy (Peah 1:1).

The tradition distinguishes it from tzedakah, charity, and the distinction is exact. The Talmud states that lovingkindness is greater in three respects: charity is given with money whereas lovingkindness may be given with one's own person, charity is for the poor whereas lovingkindness is owed to rich and poor alike, and charity is for the living whereas lovingkindness extends to the dead (Sukkah 49b). The last point identifies the tradition's limiting case: care of the dead, and accompanying them to burial, is called hesed shel emet, true kindness, on the reasoning that it is the one kindness that cannot possibly be repaid.

The standard instances are concrete rather than abstract: visiting the sick, hospitality to guests, providing for a bride, escorting travellers, comforting mourners, and burying the dead. Around each of these an institutional history grew, the burial societies, the free-loan funds, the sick-visiting and hospitality associations that were standard features of Jewish communal organisation across Europe and the Ottoman lands, and their modern successors in synagogue committees and social service agencies.

Its theological anchor is imitation of God. The Talmud reads the command to "walk after the LORD your God" as an instruction to imitate God's attributes, and then specifies them from the narratives: as God clothed the naked, visited the sick, comforted mourners and buried the dead, so should you (Sotah 14a). The argument is characteristic of rabbinic ethics in deriving the content of obligation from what the biblical God is depicted doing rather than from a definition of the good.

The Gemach: An Institution with a Name of Its Own

The abstract virtue of gemilut hasadim produced a concrete and enduring communal institution, the gemach, an acronym of the term that in ordinary Jewish usage now names a free-loan or free-lending society, and tracing its history shows how a virtue becomes infrastructure.

The institution's textual root is the prohibition on charging interest to a fellow Jew (Exodus 22:24, Leviticus 25:36-37, Deuteronomy 23:20-21), which made interest-free lending, rather than outright charity, the preferred halakhic mechanism for helping someone in difficulty while preserving their dignity as a borrower rather than a recipient of alms. Free-loan societies organized around this principle became a standard feature of Jewish communal life across early modern Europe and the Islamic world, and the model traveled with Jewish immigration: Hebrew Free Loan Societies were founded in numerous American cities from the late nineteenth century, providing small interest-free loans to immigrant families to start businesses or cover emergencies, several of which, including the Hebrew Free Loan Society of San Francisco founded in 1897, still operate today.

Contemporary Orthodox communities, particularly in Israel and large American Orthodox neighborhoods, have extended the gemach concept far beyond money: gemachs now lend or give away wedding dresses, baby equipment, medical equipment such as wheelchairs and crutches, books, and items needed for a single holiday or life-cycle event, each typically run informally out of a private home by a volunteer, evidence often cited within these communities that gemilut hasadim, having no fixed measure, keeps generating new institutional forms.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Acts of loving kindness are held as a standing obligation and are a principal expression of this stream's communal life.

Acts of loving kindness are held as a standing obligation, and this stream sustains a dense network of mutual aid institutions on that basis.

Acts of loving kindness are retained in full. This stream drops the theology and keeps the ethics, and this is one of the duties it keeps.

Judaism, Religions
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Acts of loving kindness are held as a standing obligation and are organised communally as well as individually.

Acts of loving kindness are held as one of the pillars on which the world stands, and the obligation is unlimited in a way that charity is not.

Acts of loving kindness are retained as a duty of the civilisation, needing no supernatural sanction to be binding.

Acts of loving kindness are held as obligatory, and this stream places them among the duties it never treated as optional.

Sources
1. The Mishnah
Anonymous (rabbinic compilers)Avot 1:2, on the three pillars, and Peah 1:1View the Source
The Babylonian Talmud
Anonymous (multiple authors), Soncino Press, 1935Sukkah 49b; Sotah 14aView the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.