Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Religious conversion

Also Known As Conversion · deconversion
The Study of Religion

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Conversion covers a range of changes: sudden crisis experiences of the kind William James studied, gradual affiliation and socialization, and organized missionary success. The mirror process, deconversion or disaffiliation, is now studied alongside it as people leave traditions. Sociology treats conversion less as a single inner event than as a process shaped by relationships, community and biography.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1
Standing as a Comparative Category
A standard analytic category in the study of religion 1
Doctrinal Category
The Study of Religion 1
Origins
Held By
Cross-cultural 1
Learn More
Changing Religion, and What That Involves

Conversion is the adoption of a religious identity, whether by moving from one tradition to another, from none to one, or from nominal to committed practice within a tradition already held.

Its academic study begins with William James's Varieties of Religious Experience (1902), which distinguished the sudden, crisis-driven conversion of the "twice-born" from the gradual, undramatic development of the "once-born", and observed that the first has been far more studied without being the more common. The Pauline model, a sudden reversal on the Damascus road, has dominated Western conceptions of what conversion looks like, and Krister Stendahl argued influentially that even Paul's own account is better described as a prophetic call within Judaism than as a conversion away from it, which illustrates how strongly the paradigm shapes the reading of its own founding case.

Later scholarship has moved from psychological accounts of the individual toward social ones. Studies of new religious movements, notably Lofland and Stark's work from 1965, found that conversion typically follows pre-existing social ties, people join religions their friends and relatives already belong to, and that belief frequently follows affiliation rather than preceding it, which reverses the intuitive order. The "brainwashing" model, applied to new movements in the 1970s and used both in litigation and to justify coercive deprogramming, has been rejected by the great majority of scholars of religion and by most courts, and the deprogramming industry it supported was largely dismantled. That rejection does not entail that no group uses coercive or manipulative practices, and scholars are careful to distinguish the general theory, which failed, from the assessment of particular groups, which must be done case by case.

Traditions differ sharply in whether they seek converts. Christianity and Islam are the major missionary religions and between them account for most of the world's conversion. Judaism accepts converts but does not seek them and traditionally discourages an applicant initially. Hinduism historically had no conversion mechanism, and whether one can become a Hindu is genuinely contested within it. Zoroastrianism and the Druze do not accept converts at all, and the Parsi community's position on this is bound up with its demographic decline.

Conversion is politically consequential in a way that makes it a persistent flashpoint. Several Indian states have anti-conversion laws restricting conversion by force, fraud or inducement, which critics argue are used in practice to harass minorities and those who work with them. Several Muslim-majority states criminalise conversion from Islam. And the right to change one's religion, protected under Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is among the most contested provisions of international human rights law precisely because it is the point at which individual freedom and communal continuity collide most directly.

How Traditions Stage the Moment Itself

Article one treats conversion mainly as a sociological and psychological process. What varies just as sharply between bodies is how, or whether, they ritualise the moment of joining, and the differences are informative in their own right.

The Catholic Church formalised its process for adult converts comparatively recently in its long history: the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults, restoring an ancient catechumenate structure, was promulgated after the Second Vatican Council and became normative from the 1970s, spreading candidates' formation across an extended period marked by public stages rather than a single moment. Protestant revivalism took the opposite route toward compression rather than extension: the altar call, developed within American revivalism and carried worldwide through crusades associated with preachers such as Billy Graham, concentrates conversion into a single public, immediate response, walking forward at a specific point in a service.

Islam requires neither an extended catechumenate nor an emotional crisis: reciting the shahada, the declaration that there is no god but God and that Muhammad is his messenger, sincerely and before witnesses, is generally held to be sufficient and immediate, with no clergy required to administer it. Judaism sits at the demanding end, requiring formal study, appearance before a rabbinical court, and for men circumcision, together with immersion in a mikveh, a process that can take years and that the tradition does not encourage anyone to shorten. The variation shows that "how long conversion should take" is itself a theological claim about what conversion is, not a neutral administrative choice.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Kongo is the standard case of a conversion carried by a ruling house rather than by a mission working upward.

Her conversion carried the chiefly class with it, the pattern historians of mission call conversion from the top down. The kapu system had already been broken in 1819, with her leading part.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Belongs to Tradition

Why this is disputed. Zoroastrians of Iran and the wider Iranian diaspora have generally been more open to conversion and interfaith families than the historically endogamous Parsi community of India, though the question remains argued within both.

Why this is disputed. Whether a person may convert into the faith, and whether children of interfaith marriages may be considered Zoroastrian, has long been disputed among Parsis, historically the more restrictive of the two communities.

Related To

Studied as a cross-cultural comparative-religion category rather than a teaching of one named tradition. Classification follows the doctrine's own authored Tradition field (Cross-tradition / Cross-cultural).

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Sources
1. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005ConversionView the Source
The Zoroastrian Diaspora: Religion and Migration
John R. Hinnells, Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions
John Bowker (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1997Entry ConversionView the Source
The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements
James R. Lewis (ed.), Oxford University Press, 2004On conversion, social networks and the brainwashing controversy
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.