Symphonia holds that priesthood and empire are two gifts of God to humanity which should sound together: the priesthood attending to things divine, the emperor to human affairs, and neither absorbing the other. Its classic statement is the preface to Justinian's sixth Novel, which makes the concord of the two the condition of the commonwealth's wellbeing. It remains the Orthodox vocabulary for church and state relations and is regularly contrasted with the Western two swords tradition, where the question was which power ranked above the other rather than how the two might agree.
Facts
Position Profile
Earliest FormulationThe preface to the sixth Novel of Justinian, which calls priesthood and empire the two greatest gifts of God and makes their concord the condition of the commonwealth's good. 1 Principal ProponentSourced to the subject's own accountEmperor Justinian I, who reigned 527 to 565, is the doctrine's clearest historical proponent, articulating that imperial authority and priesthood are regarded as closely interdependent, with neither, at least in theory, subordinate to the other. 2 Opposing PositionSourced to the subject's own accountThe Western tradition that symphonia is often contrasted with traces to a different founding document, Pope Gelasius I's 494 letter to the Byzantine emperor Anastasius, Famuli vestrae pietatis, which describes two powers, the sacred authority of bishops and royal power, and states plainly that priestly authority outranks royal authority in matters bearing on eternal judgement even where royal power governs ordinary secular affairs, a structurally different starting point from symphonia's mutual, non-subordinate harmony. 3 Origins
Held ByByzantine and later Russian Orthodox political theology, which held the ideal of a harmonious, cooperative relationship between emperor and church rather than the subordination of one to the other. 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionStandard teaching, not formally defined 1Tradition: Eastern Orthodoxy Current StatusSourced to the subject's own accountThe doctrine was reasserted in Russia in the Stoglav, a church law code promulgated in 1551, and it remains a live point of reference in Russian church-state discourse: Patriarch Kirill of Moscow discussed symphonia directly with President Dmitry Medvedev following his own accession to the patriarchate in February 2009. 2 Tradition
Scriptural BasisSourced to the subject's own accountSymphonia traces its scriptural grounding to Old Testament precedent rather than to any Christian innovation: the priest-king Melchizedek and the working relationship between Aaron and Moses are both cited as models of the divine and civil offices operating side by side. 2 Controversy
Point in DisputeSourced to the subject's own accountThe Orthodox theologian Stanley Harakas has argued there are almost no existing presuppositions for symphonia's implementation as a system of church-state relations in modern times, calling it an impossible ideal under contemporary conditions even where it continues to inform Orthodox thinking about how a properly ordered state should relate to the church. 2 Learn More
Two Powers, One Harmony
Symphonia, Greek for harmony or agreement, is the Byzantine Empire's own theological account of the proper relationship between imperial and ecclesiastical authority, formulated classically in the sixth century preface to a law code issued under the emperor Justinian, which describes priesthood and empire as the two greatest gifts God gave humanity, distinct in their competencies, the priesthood tending divine matters and the empire tending human affairs, yet meant to operate in concord for the good of the whole community.
Unlike the later Western medieval theory of the two swords, which developed within a persistent and often adversarial competition between pope and emperor for supremacy, symphonia describes an ideal of cooperation between offices the theory holds to be genuinely distinct in kind rather than locked in a hierarchy where one must ultimately outrank the other. In principle this meant the emperor was expected to defend Orthodoxy and support the church materially while the church prayed for and legitimated imperial rule, each respecting the other's proper sphere, a division of labor that Byzantine political theology treated as a matter of theological principle rather than a mere practical accommodation.
An Ideal Tested by Imperial Power
In practice, symphonia gave the emperor substantial power over the church's institutional life, since emperors convened ecumenical councils, ratified or rejected their decisions, and could appoint and depose patriarchs, an imbalance critics have long pointed to as evidence that symphonia's stated equality of the two powers was frequently overridden by the state's greater practical strength, the pattern later Western historians labeled caesaropapism when describing the same Byzantine arrangement from outside its own theological self understanding.
Defenders of the Byzantine system and later Orthodox theologians have argued this criticism understates the genuine constraint symphonia placed on emperors, noting cases where patriarchs and monks resisted imperial doctrinal positions, most notably during the iconoclast controversy, at real personal cost, and arguing that symphonia's ideal of cooperation, even when imperfectly realized, differed meaningfully from a straightforward subordination of church to state. Symphonia remained an influential model beyond Byzantium itself, informing the self understanding of later Orthodox states including Russia before Peter the Great's reforms moved the relationship there closer to direct state control.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Contrasts With
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.