Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

The Nine Satanic Statements

The Way and the Virtues

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1969

Anton LaVey's nine maxims of indulgence over abstinence, vital existence over spiritual pipe dreams and undefiled wisdom over hypocritical self-deceit, printed at the opening of The Satanic Bible in 1969 as the ethical core of the Church of Satan's atheistic, self-deifying Satanism. Later Satanic groups have defined themselves partly by how they stand toward these nine lines, some adopting them, some revising them, some rejecting them outright.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Defined and binding within this tradition 1
Doctrinal Category
The Way and the Virtues 2
Current Status
Later Satanic groups have defined themselves partly by how they stand toward these nine lines, some adopting them, some revising them, some rejecting them outright. 2
Origins
Origin Period
from 1969 1
Held By
The Church of Satan 1
Belief
Subject
Ethics and conduct 2
Position Profile
Key Text
The Satanic Bible, at whose opening the nine statements are printed. 1
Learn More
LaVey's Nine Statements

Anton Szandor LaVey founded the Church of Satan in San Francisco in 1966 and, three years later, published The Satanic Bible, opening it with nine short statements presented as the tradition's ethical foundation. Satan, in LaVey's system, is not a literal being to be worshipped but a symbol of pride, carnal indulgence and the individual's own vital nature, set against what LaVey characterized as Christianity's demand for abstinence, humility and self-denial. The Nine Statements accordingly favor indulgence over abstinence, vital existence over spiritual pipe dreams, undefiled wisdom over hypocritical self-deceit and kindness only to those who deserve it, among others, framing Satanism as a rationalist, self-interested ethics dressed in inverted Christian imagery rather than a theistic religion.

LaVey drew the language and structure partly from earlier sources, including Ayn Rand's Objectivism and Might Is Right, a nineteenth-century social Darwinist tract by Ragnar Redbeard, and combined them with ceremonial trappings borrowed from occultism to build a public, media-savvy organization at a moment, the late 1960s counterculture, primed to notice it. The result was less a metaphysical system than a permission structure: an argument that self-interest, pride and bodily pleasure need no theological justification once the demand for one is set aside.

The Nine Statements remain the Church of Satan's official founding text and the clearest single expression of LaVeyan Satanism as a distinct position, atheistic about Satan as a being, but committed to a specific and contestable account of what a satisfying human life requires.

A Contested Legacy: Rejection, Revision and Schism

LaVey's Nine Statements have generated as much internal Satanic disagreement as external controversy. Michael Aquino, a Church of Satan priest, broke with LaVey in 1975 over questions of organizational direction and LaVey's own conduct, founding the Temple of Set on the claim of a direct communication from an Egyptian deity, Set, and replacing LaVey's atheistic framework with an explicitly theistic one centered on the doctrine the Temple calls Xeper, self-directed becoming. The split was personal as much as doctrinal, but it produced the first major organized rejection of LaVeyan Satanism from within the movement it created.

The Satanic Temple, founded in 2013, positions itself as a further departure, adopting its own Seven Fundamental Tenets rather than LaVey's nine and explicitly rejecting what it characterizes as LaVeyan social Darwinism and a fetishized authoritarianism, in favor of an activist, community-facing organization built around individual sovereignty, empathy and evidence-based reasoning. The Church of Satan, for its part, has publicly dismissed the Satanic Temple's activism as a political project unrelated to LaVey's own philosophy.

A separate current, represented by the Order of Nine Angles, criticizes LaVeyan Satanism from an opposite direction, describing it as a tamed, psychologized version of a properly transgressive and, in the order's own self-description, traditional Satanism. Between these positions, the Nine Statements function less as a settled scripture than as the fixed point every later current in modern Satanism has had to define itself against.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

The Nine Satanic Statements, printed at the opening of The Satanic Bible, are the Church of Satan's official founding creed.

Source The Satanic BibleAnton Szandor LaVey

Critiqued By

Order of Nine Angles, Denominations

The Order of Nine Angles presents its own "traditional Satanism" as a heretical alternative to what it characterizes as LaVey's tamed, psychologized Satanism.

Source The Black Book of SatanOrder of Nine Angles, attributed to the pseudonymous Anton Longthe holders' own account
Temple of Set, Denominations

Michael Aquino broke from the Church of Satan in 1975, rejecting LaVey's atheistic framework for the Temple of Set's explicitly theistic doctrine.

Source Satanism: A Social HistoryMassimo Introvigne
The Satanic Temple, Denominations

The Satanic Temple explicitly rejects LaVeyan social Darwinism and a fetishized authoritarianism it attributes to the Nine Satanic Statements.

Source Satanism: A Social HistoryMassimo Introvigne
Sources
1. The Satanic Bible
Anton Szandor LaVey, Avon Books, 1969
2. Satanism: A Social History
Massimo Introvigne, Brill, 2016View the Source
The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity
Per Faxneld and Jesper Aa. Petersen (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2013
The Black Book of Satan
Order of Nine Angles, attributed to the pseudonymous Anton Longthe holders' own account
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.