Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

The Priesthood and Temple Restriction

Also Known As The Priesthood Ban · Official Declaration 2
Church, Sacraments and Authority

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Not present under Joseph Smith, under whom Elijah Abel and Q. Walker Lewis were both ordained. Instituted under Brigham Young, whose 1852 address to the Utah territorial legislature is the first clear statement of it.

From the mid nineteenth century until 1978 the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints did not ordain men of Black African descent to the priesthood and did not admit Black members to the temple endowment or to sealing. The restriction was not present at the founding. At least two Black men, Elijah Abel and Q. Walker Lewis, were ordained under Joseph Smith. It was put in place under Brigham Young, was defended during the following century with explanations drawn from readings of Genesis and from speculation about premortal conduct, and was extended in practice to people of African descent worldwide, with drawn-out and painful questions about how it applied in Brazil and elsewhere. Spencer W. Kimball, then president of the church, announced on 9 June 1978 that the restriction was lifted and that ordination and temple blessings were available to all worthy male members without regard to race; the announcement is canonised as Official Declaration 2. In its 2013 Gospel Topics essay on race and the priesthood, the church stated plainly that it disavows the theories advanced in the past to explain the restriction and condemns all racism. The history is recorded here as history, with its dates and its documents, because the movement's own record now does the same.

Facts
Origins
Held By
Held from 1852, under church president Brigham Young, until it was officially ended by revelation on 9 June 1978. It was practiced only by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Utah-based Latter Day Saint denomination; the movement's other branches, including the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (now Community of Christ), never adopted it and ordained Black members to their own priesthood from 1865. 1
Origin Period
Not present under Joseph Smith, under whom Elijah Abel and Q. Walker Lewis were both ordained. Instituted under Brigham Young, whose 1852 address to the Utah territorial legislature is the first clear statement of it. 2Tradition: The Latter Day Saint movement
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Rejected, or not held, within this tradition 2
The restriction on ordaining men of Black African descent to the priesthood and admitting Black members to the temple endowment and sealing ended by revelation on 9 June 1978, canonized as Official Declaration 2. The racial theories once offered to explain it were formally disavowed by the church in its 2013 Gospel Topics essay, which states the church condemns racism in any form. It is not live doctrine or policy today.
Current Status
Ended 9 June 1978 and canonised as Official Declaration 2. The explanations formerly given for it were disavowed by the church in its 2013 Gospel Topics essay. 2Tradition: The Latter Day Saint movement
Learn More
How the Restriction Began, and What Preceded It

The restriction was not present at the founding of the movement, and the church now says so in its own published statement. Under Joseph Smith at least two Black men were ordained. Elijah Abel was ordained an elder in 1836 and a seventy shortly afterward, served missions, and held his office until his death in 1884. Q. Walker Lewis, a Black abolitionist in Massachusetts, was ordained an elder around 1843. Joseph Smith ran for president of the United States in 1844 on a platform that included compensated emancipation.

The change came under Brigham Young. In 1852, addressing the Utah territorial legislature, Young stated that men of Black African descent could not hold the priesthood, and the restriction hardened into settled policy over the following decades, extending in practice to the temple ordinances and therefore to the sealing on which exaltation depends. Explanations were offered afterward rather than at the outset, drawn from readings of the curse of Cain and of Ham in Genesis and from speculation about conduct in the premortal existence. None was ever presented as a revelation, and the absence of one became increasingly conspicuous.

Its administration produced genuine anguish. Missionary work in Brazil, where mixed ancestry was common and often undocumented, forced the church into genealogical investigations of converts that satisfied nobody, and the announcement of a temple at Sao Paulo in 1975 sharpened the problem to the point of unsustainability. Members of African descent joined the church throughout this period and remained in it without access to its central ordinances.

June 1978, and the Disavowal of 2013

On the morning of 1 June 1978 the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles met in the upper room of the Salt Lake Temple. By the accounts later given by those present, Spencer W. Kimball, then president of the church, put the question to the quorum after long private prayer, and the assembled leaders reported a shared and unmistakable confirmation that the restriction should end. The decision was announced publicly on 9 June 1978 in a letter from the First Presidency stating that all worthy male members might be ordained without regard to race or colour, and that temple blessings were available to all. It was presented to a general conference on 30 September 1978 and sustained, and it stands in the Doctrine and Covenants as Official Declaration 2.

What the announcement did not do was explain the restriction. For thirty-five years the church left the explanations of the past standing by not repudiating them, and they continued to circulate in manuals, in seminary classes and in family conversation. That ended in December 2013, when the church published its Gospel Topics essay on race and the priesthood. The essay states that the restriction began under Brigham Young, that no revelation is known to have established it, and that the church disavows the theories advanced in the past, naming among them the ideas that Black skin is a sign of divine disfavour or a curse, and that people were less valiant in a premortal life. It condemns all racism, past and present.

The essay is the tradition's own account and is cited here as such. It is also, by any reading, an unusual document for a church to publish about itself.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source The Oxford Handbook of MormonismTerryl L. Givens and Philip L. Barlow (eds.)

Rejected Here

Community of Christ, Denominations

Community of Christ did not adopt the racial priesthood and temple restriction that shaped mainline Latter-day Saint practice from the 1850s until 1978.

Source The Oxford Handbook of MormonismTerryl L. Givens and Philip L. Barlow (eds.)

Related To

Official Declaration 2 is the clearest modern instance of the open canon in operation, and the reason the church had afterward to account for what the earlier teaching had been.

The restriction barred ordination to both orders, and therefore barred the temple ordinances that the Melchizedek priesthood governs, for members of Black African descent until June 1978.

Sources
1. Religion of a Different Color: Race and the Mormon Struggle for Whiteness
W. Paul Reeve, Oxford University Press, 2015View the Source
2. Race and the Priesthood (Gospel Topics essay)
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 2013View the Source
Brigham Young: Pioneer Prophet
John G. Turner, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012View the Source
The Oxford Handbook of Mormonism
Terryl L. Givens and Philip L. Barlow (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2015View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.