Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Two Kingdoms

Also Known As The two governments · Zwei-Reiche-Lehre
Religion and Political Authority

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

In Temporal Authority: To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed, Luther distinguished the kingdom God rules through the Gospel, in which the Christian needs no coercion, from the kingdom God rules through the civil sword, which restrains the wicked and which Christians are to obey and may serve in. The doctrine both defended civil government as a divine ordinance and denied princes any authority over conscience and the preaching of the Word. It has been read in sharply different ways since, including as a warrant for political quietism, a charge pressed hard against German Lutheranism after 1945 and answered by theologians who argue that Luther's distinction was never a separation of ethics from public life.

Facts
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Martin Luther's distinction between God's spiritual rule, exercised through the gospel over the conscience, and God's temporal rule, exercised through civil government and the sword over outward conduct, neither kingdom subordinate to the other. 2
Origins
Held By
Native Lutheran doctrine specifically, God's two ways of ruling, spiritual through the Gospel and temporal through civil authority, per Luther's 1523 treatise Temporal Authority, To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed. 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 2
Disputed
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
Invoked by some German Lutheran leaders in the 1930s to justify quietism toward the Nazi state, a use the Confessing Church movement, including Dietrich Bonhoeffer, rejected as a misapplication of Luther's teaching. 2
Learn More
Luther's Two Governments

Martin Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms distinguishes God's spiritual rule, exercised through the gospel and operating on the inner person's conscience and relationship with God, from God's temporal rule, exercised through civil government and the sword, operating on outward conduct and social order among sinners regardless of their faith. Both kingdoms, on Luther's account, are genuinely instituted by God and neither is subordinate to the other in the way medieval two swords theory made temporal power subordinate to spiritual power, a sharp break from the dominant medieval Western Christian model.

Civil government, for Luther, does not require Christian faith to be legitimate and does not need the church's sanction to exercise its proper function of restraining evil and preserving order, a position that let Luther support the German princes' authority to suppress the Peasants' War in 1525 as a legitimate exercise of temporal government's God given task, a position for which Luther has since drawn considerable criticism. The doctrine gave Lutheran political theology a distinctive account of why Christians owe genuine obedience to secular authority even when that authority is not itself Christian or acting in an explicitly religious capacity.

A Doctrine Later Lutherans Have Debated

Twentieth century history gave two kingdoms theology its most severe test and its most serious internal critics: some German Lutheran leaders invoked the doctrine's separation of spiritual and temporal authority to justify quietism or accommodation toward the Nazi state in the 1930s, treating political resistance as outside the church's proper spiritual sphere, a use the Confessing Church movement, including theologians such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer, rejected as a serious misapplication of Luther's own teaching.

Contemporary Lutheran and broader Protestant political theology remains divided over how to read Luther correctly on this point, with some scholars arguing the doctrine was never meant to silence the church's prophetic voice against manifest civil injustice and others treating the doctrine's historical use as a caution about a real internal weakness in its logic. Two kingdoms theology is frequently compared with and distinguished from Byzantine symphonia and the medieval Catholic two swords doctrine, since all three address the same underlying question, how spiritual and temporal authority relate, but locate the line between them, and the degree of independence each grants the state, quite differently from one another.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Luther's Temporal Authority of 1523 sets out the two governments, the spiritual through the word and the temporal through law and the sword, both of them God's and neither to be confused with the other. The Augsburg Confession states the same in its article on civil affairs, holding that the gospel does not overthrow the state.

Two Kingdoms is native Lutheran doctrine, God's two ways of ruling, spiritual through the Gospel and temporal through civil authority, per Luther's Temporal Authority: To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed, 1523.

Contrasts With

Two Swords, Doctrines
Sources
1. Temporal Authority: To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed
Martin Luther, 1523Temporal Authority: To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed, 1523
2. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.