Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Vishishtadvaita

Philosophy of Religion

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Vishishtadvaita, Ramanuja's qualified non-dualism, holds that Brahman is one reality but not undifferentiated: souls and matter are real, eternal attributes of Brahman, related to it as a body's parts relate to its self, so the world is a genuine part of God rather than an illusion cast over an undifferentiated absolute. The school is inseparable from Sri Vaishnavism, the South Indian devotional tradition it gives philosophical form, and grounds Vaishnava bhakti directly in its own metaphysics of real, personal relationship between soul and God.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
The teaching of one school or lineage within the tradition 2
Doctrinal Category
Philosophy of Religion 1
Belief
Subject
The nature of the divine 1
Structure
Structure
Brahman is one reality but not undifferentiated, so the world is a genuine part of God rather than an illusion cast over an undifferentiated absolute. 1
Origins
Held By
Hinduism; Sri Vaishnavism; Vedanta 1
Position Profile
Principal Proponent
Ramanuja, whose qualified non-dualism holds that souls and matter are real and eternal attributes of Brahman, related to it as the parts of a body relate to its self. 1
Learn More
One Reality, Really Differentiated

Ramanuja, the eleventh and twelfth century Tamil theologian who systematized Vishishtadvaita, agreed with Shankara that reality is ultimately one and that Vedanta's non-dualism is correct, but broke sharply with him over what that oneness means. Shankara's Brahman is nirguna, without attributes, and the differentiated world of souls and matter is Maya, an appearance that liberating knowledge dissolves. Ramanuja's Sri Bhashya, his commentary on the Brahma Sutras, argues at length that this reading cannot be squared with scripture's own plain sense, which repeatedly describes Brahman as possessing real, positive qualities and as genuinely related to a real world, and that calling the entire universe of ordinary experience an illusion empties devotion, ethics and scripture itself of coherent meaning. His alternative, qualified non-dualism, vishishtadvaita, holds that Brahman is one but not undifferentiated: souls and matter are Brahman's real, eternal attributes, related to it as a body's parts are related to its self, distinct in name and function yet incapable of existing apart from the whole they compose.

This body-self analogy, sharira-shariri-bhava, is the school's central technical move. Just as a person's body is entirely dependent on and controlled by that person's self, yet remains genuinely distinct from it in nature, souls and the material world are Brahman's body, wholly dependent, wholly pervaded and controlled, yet really existing as themselves rather than as illusion. The world is not something Brahman merely appears to become; it is something Brahman genuinely possesses and inhabits, which lets Ramanuja affirm non-dualism, one ultimate reality, without denying the reality of anything the world actually contains.

Twin Vedanta and the Grace of a Real God

Vishishtadvaita is inseparable from Sri Vaishnavism, the South Indian devotional tradition Ramanuja inherited and gave philosophical form. The school calls its own method ubhaya vedanta, the twin Vedanta, because it treats the Sanskrit Upanishads and Brahma Sutras as one authoritative source and the Tamil devotional hymns of the Alvar poet-saints, collected as the Divya Prabandham, as a second, equally canonical source of the same truth, sung rather than reasoned. Ramanuja's own teaching accordingly runs on two registers at once, a rigorous scholastic philosophy defending the reality of a qualified, differentiated Brahman against Advaita, and a warm devotional theology in which Vishnu, worshipped as Narayana together with his consort Sri, is approached through prapatti, total surrender, as much as through philosophical understanding.

The school's doctrine of grace follows directly from its metaphysics. Because souls are real, dependent parts of God rather than illusory appearances destined to dissolve, their relationship to God is genuinely personal and can genuinely be marked by love, dependence and rescue rather than by the dispassionate self-knowledge Advaita prescribes. Later Sri Vaishnava teachers debated exactly how much the soul must do to secure that grace, a question later schools within the tradition answered differently, but the underlying vishishtadvaita metaphysics, one reality, really differentiated, really related as body to self, remained the fixed philosophical foundation beneath every version of that debate.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Hinduism, Religions

Vishishtadvaita, Ramanuja's qualified non-dualism, is Sri Vaishnavism's philosophical system, worked out within this tradition specifically.

Vishishtadvaita, Ramanuja's qualified non-dualism, is this school's defining, denomination-naming doctrine.

Critiqued Here

Advaita Vedanta, Schools of Theology

Advaita argues against the qualified non-dualist reading: to make souls and matter real eternal attributes of Brahman is, on the Advaita account, to leave difference standing in the ultimate and so to fall short of the non-duality the texts declare.

Positions on This Question

Sources
1. The Theology of Ramanuja: An Essay in Interreligious Understanding
John B. Carman, Yale University Press, 1974View the Source
2. An Introduction to Hinduism
Gavin Flood, Cambridge University Press, 1996View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.