Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Enochian Governors

Occodon

OK-oh-don

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1584

Occodon stands first among the ninety-one Parts of the Earth set out in Dee's Liber Scientiae, and is placed in LIL, the first of the thirty Aethyrs. Its territory is given as Egypt. The governing Zodiacal King is Zarzilg, associated in the received material with the tribe of Naphtali. The sign of Gemini attached to that King is not Dee's: the angels told him to derive the zodiacal attributions from the tribes, and there is no evidence in the diaries that he ever did, so every sign in this set is a later reconstruction and the surviving reconstructions disagree with one another. Dee compiled the tabulation in May 1585 from sessions worked the previous year with Edward Kelley as scryer.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1584 1Tradition: John Dee and Edward Kelley's angelic sessions
Origin Period
1888 to 1900 2Tradition: Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn
Origin Period
1900 to 1909 3Tradition: Thelema
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
Compiled into Liber Scientiae, dated 2 May 1585 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
Sessions ran from 1583, completed 13 July 1584 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Place of Origin
Cracow and Prague, under Albert Laski's patronage and the imperial court 5
Place of Origin
Dee's house at Mortlake for the earlier sessions 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
Edward Kelley scried and spoke the answers Dee wrote down 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
John Dee, mathematician and royal adviser, asked the questions 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
No independent witness to the sessions exists 5
Origin of the NameSourced to the subject's own account
No etymology, not derived from any known language 6
Origin of the NameSourced to the subject's own account
One of the ninety-one names received through Kelley's scrying in 1584 6
Origin of the NameSourced to the subject's own account
Tabulated in Dee's register 6
LanguageSourced to the subject's own account
Enochian (Angelical) 6
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own account
Dee's register gives only name, Aethyr, King and minister count 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own account
No character, office, element, tarot, rank or Tree of Life place 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own account
That layer of attribution is the Golden Dawn's, from 1888 on 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
A modern system making claims scholarship never entertained; it never held scholarly standing 5
Whether Kelley reported or invented what he saw is an open question
Learn More
How the Ninety-One Arrived

The material behind the ninety-one Parts of the Earth comes from a specific, well-dated series of sessions. Between 1583 and 1587 the mathematician and royal adviser John Dee worked with the scryer Edward Kelley in a sustained attempt to obtain instruction from angels. Kelley looked into a crystal and reported what he saw and heard; Dee sat with pen and paper and wrote it down, asked questions, and occasionally argued.

The portion relevant here belongs to the work of 1584, much of it conducted in Cracow and Prague under the patronage of the Polish nobleman Albert Laski and later at the imperial court. The angel named Nalvage introduced it by telling Dee that thirty Calls remained to be delivered, and that those thirty were the Calls of ninety-one Princes and Spiritual Governors, to whom the earth was delivered as a portion. The stated purpose was practical and political: these were the powers that bring in and dispose kings and governments, and the Calls were the means of reaching them.

The delivery of this body of material was completed on 13 July 1584, with the final portion of the Call of the Aethyrs and the names of the thirty Aethyrs themselves. Dee then compiled the results into a book, Liber Scientiae Auxilii et Victoriae Terrestris, the Book of Knowledge, Help and Earthly Victory, which he dated 2 May 1585. That book is a table. For each of the ninety-one Parts it gives the name, the Aethyr the Part belongs to, the Zodiacal King that governs it, and a count of the ministers said to dwell there.

Everything else attached to the Parts in modern practice was added later, and in most cases much later. The tabulation itself is short, dry and administrative, and reads far more like a register than like a revelation.

Kelley, and the Question That Has Never Closed

Every word of this material reached the page through one man's mouth. Kelley scried; Dee recorded. That arrangement makes the honesty of Edward Kelley a question that cannot be set aside, and it is a genuinely unresolved one rather than a polite gesture toward balance.

The case against him is substantial. Kelley had a criminal record, is generally reported to have lost his ears as a judicial punishment, and habitually wore a close cap. He was a known forger. He was paid well and steadily by Dee, which gave him an obvious motive to keep the sessions productive. He later persuaded Dee, on angelic authority, that the two men should share their wives, an episode that damaged the partnership and that reads badly under any interpretation.

The case is not conclusive. The volume and internal consistency of the material are considerable; the Enochian Calls have a stable vocabulary across separate sessions weeks apart, which is difficult though not impossible to fake under questioning by a scholar as exacting as Dee. Kelley also frequently reported material that displeased him and that he argued against, which is not the behaviour of a straightforward confidence man.

Scholarship has moved. Frances Yates wrote flatly that Kelley was a fraud who deluded his pious master, and Peter French added the possibility of mental illness. More recent historians of Dee, among them Deborah Harkness, Nicholas Clulee, Gyorgy Szonyi and Hakan Hakansson, have largely declined to rule on it, treating the diaries as excellent evidence of what Dee believed and experienced and poor evidence of what was happening in the crystal. Egil Asprem has noted that this leaves a real gap rather than closing one.

The honest position is that the question is open, that it matters, and that the material can be described without settling it.

Sources The Queen's Conjuror: The Science and Magic of Dr. John DeeBenjamin Woolley with John Dee's Conversations with Angels: Cabala, Alchemy, and the End of NatureDeborah E. Harkness, John Dee's Natural Philosophy: Between Science and ReligionNicholas H. Clulee

What the Table Says, and What Has Been Added to It

A reader coming to the Parts of the Earth from modern occult literature will find a great deal attributed to them: elemental natures, tarot correspondences, sephirotic placements, ranks of authority, detailed characters and specific magical offices. Almost none of that is in Dee.

Dee's table gives four things per Part. The name. The Aethyr it falls under. The Zodiacal King that governs it. The number of ministers dwelling in it. It also relates each Part to a region of the earth. That is the whole of the primary record.

The additions came in two main waves. The first was the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, which from the 1880s absorbed Dee's Enochian material into a much larger synthesis and supplied it with the correspondences the order used everywhere else: elements, tarot trumps, Hebrew letters, positions on the Tree of Life. Samuel Liddell MacGregor Mathers took the basics of Dee's system and fitted them into a ritual structure Dee would not have recognised. The second wave was Aleister Crowley, who learned Enochian in the Golden Dawn and carried its assumptions into his own work, adding a Thelemic layer on top.

There is also a reading dispute at the root of the thing. Nalvage's words describe ninety-one Princes and Spiritual Governors, which supports treating each name as a being to be addressed. But some careful readers of Dee's own tables, notably Benjamin Rowe, have argued that the name in that column is the name of the Part in the angelic language rather than of any resident spirit, and that the word Governor properly belongs to the twelve Zodiacal Kings listed in a separate column. Both readings can be defended from the manuscript. Practice has overwhelmingly followed the first, largely because the Golden Dawn did.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Contained In

This governor's name is one of the ninety one Parts of the Earth traced from the Great Table's grid.

Disciplines That Use This

Under Patronage Of

Liber Scientiae places this Part of the Earth under the Zodiacal King who rules the tribe of Naphtali.

Source Liber Scientiae, Auxilii et Victoriae TerrestrisJohn Dee and Edward Kelley
Sources
1. A True and Faithful Relation of What Passed for Many Years Between Dr. John Dee and Some Spirits
John Dee, edited by Meric Casaubon, T. Garthwait, 1659View the Source
2. The Magicians of the Golden Dawn: A Documentary History of a Magical Order 1887-1923
Ellic Howe, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972on the order's foundation in 1888 and the composition of its knowledge lecturesView the Source
3. The Western Esoteric Traditions: A Historical Introduction
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Oxford University Press, 2008the chapter on Crowley and Thelema, and on what the Golden Dawn passed to himView the Source
4. Liber Scientiae, Auxilii et Victoriae Terrestris
John Dee and Edward Kelley, 1585The tables of the ninety-one
Quote, The tables of the ninety-one
Nalvage's received text names "ninety-one Princes and Spiritual Governors"; the tables give name, Aethyr, tribe, ministers and region.
5. John Dee's Conversations with Angels: Cabala, Alchemy, and the End of Nature
Deborah E. Harkness, Cambridge University Press, 1999the chapters on the continental journey of 1583 to 1589View the Source
6. Mysteriorum Libri Quinque and Liber Loagaeth (British Library Sloane MSS 3188 and 3189)
John Dee and Edward Kelley, 1583Dee's manuscript record of the sessions and of the received namesView the Source
Benjamin Rowe's edition of Dee's Enochian Governors material
Benjamin RoweThe zodiacal attributions
Quote, The zodiacal attributions
The angels told Dee to derive zodiacal attributions from the tribes and, so far as the record shows, he never did; the signs are a modern reconstruction.
The Golden Dawn: The Original Account of the Teachings, Rites, and Ceremonies of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, 6th edition
Israel Regardie, Llewellyn, 1989View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.