Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Figures

Karl Barth

Swiss Reformed theologian whose dialectical theology became the central figure of Neo-Orthodoxy

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Karl Barth was a Swiss Reformed theologian whose dialectical theology became the central reference point of twentieth century Neo-Orthodoxy. His 1919 commentary on Paul's Epistle to the Romans, revised sharply in 1922, broke with the liberal Protestant confidence that human culture and religious experience stood in continuity with divine revelation, insisting instead on God's own self-disclosure in Jesus Christ as the sole ground of theology. He taught at Bonn and then, after refusing an oath of unconditional loyalty to Hitler, at Basel, and in 1934 published a sharp public rejection of Emil Brunner's argument for a point of contact in natural theology. The same year he was the principal author of the Barmen Declaration, in which the Confessing Church in Germany rejected the "German Christian" movement's attempt to fuse the gospel with National Socialist ideology. His multi-volume Church Dogmatics, left unfinished at his death, remains the most extensive work of systematic theology written in the twentieth century.

Facts
Origins
Place of Origin
Basel, Switzerland. 1
Defining Moment
Principal author of the 1934 Barmen Declaration, in which the Confessing Church in Germany rejected the "German Christian" movement's attempt to fuse the gospel with National Socialist ideology. 1
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Traditions Revering This Figure
Christianity 1
Identity
Gender
Male 1
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
1886 to 1968 1
Learn More
A Commentary That Broke With Liberal Protestantism

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Karl Barth was a Swiss Reformed theologian whose 1919 commentary on Paul's Epistle to the Romans, revised sharply in 1922, broke with the liberal Protestant confidence that human culture and religious experience stood in continuity with divine revelation. In its place Barth insisted on God's own self disclosure in Jesus Christ as the sole ground of theology, rather than on human religious experience as a starting point.

That break became the central reference point of twentieth century Neo-Orthodoxy, a movement that took its bearings from Barth's insistence on revelation over cultural continuity. He taught at Bonn and then, after refusing an oath of unconditional loyalty to Hitler, at Basel, a refusal that placed his theological position and his political position in direct alignment rather than in separate spheres.

His multi-volume Church Dogmatics, left unfinished at his death in 1968, remains the most extensive work of systematic theology written in the twentieth century, a scale of output that grew directly out of the theological program the 1919 and 1922 Romans commentaries had first set in motion.

Barth was born in Basel, Switzerland, in 1886, and it was to Basel that he returned after his years teaching at Bonn ended, so the city of his birth and the city where he wrote most of the Church Dogmatics were, in the end, the same place, a return that closed the geographic distance his career had opened between a Swiss theologian's origins and a German academic career interrupted by political conflict.

Rejecting a Church Fused to National Socialism

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

In 1934, the same year he published a sharp public rejection of Emil Brunner's argument for a point of contact in natural theology, Karl Barth was the principal author of the Barmen Declaration, in which the Confessing Church in Germany rejected the German Christian movement's attempt to fuse the gospel with National Socialist ideology.

That declaration was not an abstract theological dispute conducted at a safe distance from politics. Barth had already refused an oath of unconditional loyalty to Hitler while teaching at Bonn, a refusal that cost him his position there and moved him to Basel, so the Barmen Declaration extended into collective church statement a resistance he had already made personally and at direct professional cost.

The declaration's argument was theological rather than purely political, it held that the church's sole head is Jesus Christ, not any other authority, human ideology or national movement, the same insistence on revelation over cultural continuity that had structured Barth's Romans commentary fifteen years earlier. The 1934 stand against the German Christian movement was, in that sense, the same theological commitment applied to the specific political crisis of Nazi Germany rather than a separate, later position.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Karl Barth directly: "crediting the Reformed theologian Karl Barth as principal author alongside the Lutheran pastors Hans Asmussen and Thomas Breit, and tracing the declaration's later use as a confessional standard..."

This source names Karl Barth directly: "The Reformed theologian Karl Barth wrote the six part text over a single night in a Frankfurt hotel room together with the Lutheran pastors Hans Asmussen and Thomas Breit, and it rejected the claim..."

Belongs to Tradition

Barth taught and wrote as a Swiss Reformed Protestant theologian throughout his career.

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Traditions Founded

Neo-Orthodoxy's central figure is Karl Barth, whose dialectical theology reasserted the priority of God's own self-revelation over liberal Protestantism's confidence in human religious experience.

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Sources
1. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005Entry on Karl Barth and twentieth century dialectical theologyView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.