A Castilian kabbalist of the later thirteenth century, known both from a substantial body of Hebrew works signed in his own name and from his central place in the appearance of the Zohar. He worked at Guadalajara and later at Avila, and died in 1305 at Arevalo while travelling. Scholarship since Gershom Scholem credits him with the composition of the Zohar, which circulated in his lifetime as the recovered teaching of a second-century sage. Whether he wrote it alone or belonged to a circle of writers is argued still, and that question is among the central ones in the study of Spanish Kabbalah.
Facts
Life
Lifespan or FloruitThe death at Arevalo in 1305 is on record. The birth year is an estimate worked back from his first datable writing and is not attested. Place of ActivityGuadalajara and later Avila, in the kingdom of Castile 1 Origins
Place of OriginLeon, in the Kingdom of Castile 1 Publications
Notable PublicationSefer ha-Rimmon (The Book of the Pomegranate), a symbolic reading of the commandments 1 Notable PublicationShekel ha-Kodesh, one of the signed Hebrew treatises used to test the Zohar's authorship 1 Disputed
Lifespan or FloruitThe source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date. Identity
Also Known AsMoshe ben Shem Tov de Leon 1 Attestation
HistoricityA documented Castilian author of the later thirteenth century, known from a corpus of signed Hebrew works and from the record of his death in 1305. Learn More
The Books He Signed
Moses de Leon is not a shadowy figure. A substantial body of Hebrew writing survives under his own name, most of it produced in the 1280s and 1290s, and it can be read alongside the Zohar rather than only as background to it. Sefer ha-Rimmon, the Book of the Pomegranate, treats the commandments as a symbolic system reflecting the structure of the divine world. Shekel ha-Kodesh and Or Zarua work over the same material, and a run of shorter treatises and responsa fills out the picture of a working kabbalist writing for an educated Hebrew readership rather than for a coterie.
The evidence for his life is thin but real. He is associated with Guadalajara, where much of the signed output was written, and later with Avila. The record places his death at Arevalo in 1305, on a journey home.
Beyond that the documentary trail runs out, and the colour that fills the gap in later accounts comes from a single much repeated report by Isaac of Acre, who wrote that he had gone looking for the ancient manuscript of the Zohar, and that de Leon's widow told him no such manuscript existed because her husband had written the book himself. Scholars differ on how much weight the story bears, since Isaac's account survives only at second hand in a later compilation and its details do not all hang together. It is not the foundation of the modern case, but it is where the modern question begins.
How the Zohar Came to Be His
The Zohar appears in Castile in the 1280s, in sections rather than as a finished book, and de Leon is the man distributing them. He described himself as copying from an ancient manuscript brought out of the land of Israel. The work is in Aramaic and its speakers are Shimon bar Yochai and his companions.
Gershom Scholem's case, set out in Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism and refined afterwards, rests on internal evidence rather than on the widow's story. The Zohar's Aramaic belongs to no period of the living language but is a construction, built with the help of medieval Hebrew grammar and the Aramaic lexicons then available, and it makes errors an ancient writer could not have made. Its picture of the geography of the land of Israel is the picture of someone who has not been there. And its ideas, its images and at points its phrasing run parallel to de Leon's signed Hebrew books closely enough that one author is the simplest account of it.
Yehuda Liebes accepted all of the dating and none of the singularity. In How the Zohar Was Written he argued that the book carries several hands and grew inside a circle, with de Leon its most visible member rather than its sole author. That reading is now widely held. It is why the atlas records the Zohar's authorship as disputed rather than simply transferring it from the second-century sage to the Castilian, and why the entry for each man carries the other's claim.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Attributed Works
Why this is disputed. Modern academic scholarship, beginning with Gershom Scholem's foundational study, credits the thirteenth century Spanish Kabbalist Moses de Leon as the Zohar's actual composer, based on stylistic and linguistic analysis linking its distinctive Aramaic to de Leon's own known Hebrew writings. Some later scholars, notably Yehuda Liebes, have refined this to a circle of Kabbalists working around de Leon rather than a single author. Kabbalistic tradition itself never credited de Leon, holding instead that he transmitted rather than composed the ancient teaching of Shimon bar Yochai.
Belongs to Tradition
Disciplines That Use This
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.