Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Language Families

Sumerian

Isolates

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The language of the earliest cities and the earliest writing, spoken in southern Iraq and related to nothing else known. Akkadian replaced it in speech in the early second millennium BCE, and Sumerian carried on for two millennia more as the language of ritual, of the scribal curriculum and of a large body of hymns.

Facts
Disputed
Homeland Hypothesis
Southern Mesopotamia itself, on the reading that Sumerian speakers were there from the settlement of the marsh country, against the older proposal that they arrived from elsewhere and absorbed an earlier population. Neither can be shown from the language, because it has no demonstrated relative to place it beside. 1
Marie-Louise Thomsen's scholarly grammar records two competing accounts of where Sumerian speakers originated: that they were already present in southern Mesopotamia from the earliest settlement of the marsh country, and an older proposal, associated with early twentieth-century Assyriology, that they migrated into the region from elsewhere and absorbed an earlier, non-Sumerian-speaking population already living there. Both readings point to features of the language itself, including a substantial layer of vocabulary for cities, rivers, crafts and occupations that resists explanation from within Sumerian, as evidence, the indigenous reading treating it as simply old inherited vocabulary and the migration reading treating it as borrowed from the absorbed population. Neither can be demonstrated, because Sumerian is a language isolate with no demonstrated living or ancient relative against which to compare its vocabulary and test either story; the same unexplained vocabulary is compatible with both accounts and there is no external control to choose between them. The question is treated as open rather than as leaning toward either side because it depends entirely on evidence internal to a single, unrelated language.
Open Questions
Classification Status
No relative has been established. Sumerian is an isolate, and whether it ever had a relative that could now be demonstrated is not known. 1
This is a gap rather than a disagreement. Sumerian has been connected in print to Dravidian, to Uralic, to the Caucasian families, to Sino-Tibetan and to Basque, and none of these proposals has gathered a body of support; there is no school defending any of them against another, which is what would make the question debated rather than open. The mainstream position is that there is no answer at present, not that there are two. The shortage is not of Sumerian data, which is abundant and continues to grow.
Attestation
Earliest Attestation
The archaic tablets from Uruk, late fourth millennium BCE. They are the earliest writing recovered anywhere, and the earliest of them record quantities and commodities rather than connected language. 1
Whether the very earliest of these tablets are in Sumerian at all is a real question, because an accounting notation of numbers and commodity signs does not have to encode a spoken language. What is not in doubt is that the system these tablets belong to becomes Sumerian writing without a break.
Learn More
The First Written Language, and No Known Relative

Sumerian was spoken in southern Iraq in the fourth and third millennia BCE, and it is the language of the earliest substantial writing anywhere. Cuneiform was developed to write it, beginning as an accounting notation and becoming a full script capable of recording literature, law and liturgy. Sumerian has no demonstrated relative.

Proposals connecting it to Dravidian, to Uralic, to Caucasian languages and to others have been made and none has been accepted, and the reason is partly that the language is genuinely isolated and partly that the comparative method has very little to work with when one member of a proposed pair is attested only in a script that under-represents its phonology. It is also typologically unlike its neighbours: agglutinative and ergative where Akkadian, the Semitic language that shared the same cities, is neither. The two were in contact for centuries, and each borrowed heavily from the other. By around 2000 BCE Sumerian had ceased to be anybody's mother tongue, which in most cases is the end of a language's story. Here it was not. The isolation is worth holding onto for a further reason. Sumerian stands at the head of the written record for the whole ancient Near East, and much of later Mesopotamian religion, written in Akkadian, is continuous with what it first recorded. The oldest religious literature anyone can read is therefore in a language with no known relatives, and nothing in its grammar can be checked against a sister tongue.

Two Thousand Years as a Dead Liturgical Language

After Sumerian stopped being spoken it went on being written for roughly two thousand years, and that makes it one of the earliest documented cases of a language kept alive by religion. Akkadian-speaking scribes learned it in school, copied its literature, and compiled bilingual lists and grammars to teach it, in a curriculum that is itself the reason so much survives. Temple liturgy in particular stayed Sumerian: laments of the kind performed by the gala priests, hymns to the gods of the great cities, and incantations were composed and recited in it long after nobody outside the scribal and priestly classes could understand a word.

The pattern is familiar from later cases, Latin in the western church, Ge'ez in Ethiopia, Sanskrit in temple ritual, Old Church Slavonic in Orthodox liturgy, Coptic in Egypt, and this is the earliest instance anyone can document. What it preserved is substantial: the hymn cycle attributed to Enheduanna, the laments over the destroyed cities, and a body of myth about Inanna, Enki and Enlil that is the oldest religious literature in existence. A language with no relatives and no speakers left the deepest single deposit of religious text in the ancient world, because a priesthood would not let it go.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

The tradition's liturgical, scriptural or ancestral language belongs to this family.

Sources
1. The Sumerian Language: An Introduction to Its History and Grammatical Structure
Marie-Louise Thomsen, Akademisk Forlag, 1984
Open Questions (1 open question)
Does Sumerian have any demonstrable relative?

Sumerian is recorded in quantity from the late fourth millennium BCE and is the earliest written language anywhere, yet no genetic connection to another language or family has ever been demonstrated to the standard the comparative method requires. Proposals linking it to Dravidian, to Uralic, to the Caucasian families, to Sino-Tibetan and to Basque have each been published and none has been taken up. There is no camp to join and no argument in progress, which is what separates this from a contested classification: the absence is of an answer, not of agreement.

What would resolve this A set of regular sound correspondences between Sumerian and another attested language or reconstructed proto-language, covering basic vocabulary and grammatical morphology rather than isolated look-alikes, and surviving the usual controls for borrowing and for chance resemblance. Failing that, a substantial text in a related language recovered from the same region and period would give the comparison something to work from. At present Sumerian's nearest neighbours in the record are Akkadian, which is Semitic and demonstrably unrelated, and Elamite, which is itself an isolate.
Historical linguistics; Assyriology; comparative philologyMarie-Louise Thomsen, The Sumerian Language: An Introduction to Its History and Grammatical Structure
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.