Origin from 1958
The application of laboratory physics and chemistry, spectrometry, isotope analysis and thermoluminescence among them, to archaeological objects, establishing what a sacred object is materially made of and where its raw material came from.
Facts
Identity
Field Category Parent Field Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline Subject
Subjectthe elemental and physical composition of pigments, metals, ceramics and stone recovered from excavation 2 Method
Methodphysical and chemical analysis of archaeological material, applying laboratory instrumentation to objects rather than texts 2 Learn More
A Physics Laboratory in Oxford Starts Asking What Objects Are Made Of
Archaeometry applies the instruments and methods of the physical sciences, spectrometry, isotope analysis, thermoluminescence and X ray fluorescence among them, to archaeological material, asking what an object is physically made of and where its raw material came from rather than what it depicts or what a text says about it. The discipline took its name and its institutional home from the founding in 1958 of the journal Archaeometry by the University of Oxford's Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, a laboratory built explicitly to bring physics and chemistry to bear on archaeological questions that stylistic or textual analysis alone could not answer.
For the atlas the method offers an independent line of evidence for sacred objects whose origin or authenticity a tradition's own account asserts. Trace element analysis of the metal in a claimed relic, isotope sourcing of stone used in a temple's construction, or pigment analysis of an icon can confirm or contradict the material history a devotional text describes, and unlike stylistic dating, the results do not depend on anyone's judgment about what a period's art was supposed to look like. Archaeometric findings are cited here as physical evidence standing alongside, and sometimes against, textual and art historical claims.
Scholarly Disciplines of Archaeometry
Switch to Compare to put any of these side by side, here on this page. Connections
Branch Of
Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD
Open Questions Needing This
Source The Imperial Regalia: Japan's Three Sacred Treasures (Nippon.com)Nippon.com
Source Chamber of the Sacred Relics, Topkapi Palace Museum, Istanbulthe holders' own account
Source Sri Dalada Maligawa, The Temple of the Sacred Tooth Relic (official site)Sri Dalada Maligawathe holders' own account
Source Buddha Tooth Relic Stupa, Lingguang Temple (Visit Beijing official)Visit Beijing
Source Sri Dalada Maligawa (institutional record)the holders' own account
Source The Oviedo ClothMark Guscin
Source The Oviedo ClothMark Guscin
Sources
1. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source Divinity Atlas Scholarly Discipline Register
Essays About This Entity (1 essay)
Most of This Atlas's Gaps Need a Library, Not a Lab
The laboratory discipline named far less often than the library ones
Read the EssayReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.