Numbers
56
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1908 to 1965
Fifty-six is 8 x 7. Its best-attested appearance is archaeological: the ring of fifty-six chalk pits at Stonehenge known as the Aubrey holes, identified by John Aubrey in 1666 and belonging to the monument's earliest phase around 3000 BCE. They held cremated human remains, which makes Stonehenge the largest known prehistoric cremation cemetery in Britain. Gerald Hawkins argued in the 1960s that the fifty-six pits served to predict eclipses; that reading is contested and their purpose remains unsettled. A tarot deck has fifty-six minor arcana. In digit-reduction numerology it reduces to 2.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period Origin Period Origin PeriodThe arithmological reading of the first numbers, one as source, two as division, four as justice, seven as virgin, ten as completion, reaches us through Platonic and Neopythagorean writers of the centuries after Plato. Burkert's finding is that it cannot be traced to Pythagoras himself, whose activity was religious rather than mathematical: the doctrines were credited backwards to him. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Origin PeriodThe system that gives a number a personality, and a person a number, was assembled in the United States in the first half of the twentieth century out of New Thought material. Balliett's The Philosophy of Numbers appeared in 1908; the chart positions, pinnacles and cycles were added by her successors over the next fifty years. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Place of OriginThe Greek world, and above all the Greek cities of southern Italy where the Pythagorean societies were established; the arithmological literature itself is later and largely eastern Mediterranean. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Place of OriginThe United States, and specifically the New Thought circuit of the north-eastern seaboard; Balliett worked from Atlantic City. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attributed Author / CompilerAttributed by the tradition to Pythagoras. Burkert's study is the standard demonstration that the number-doctrines carrying his name are the work of later hands, and that almost nothing in them can be shown to go back to the sixth century BCE. The attribution is recorded because it is what the tradition says, not because it holds. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Attributed Author / CompilerMrs. L. Dow Balliett, who published the first version of the modern system in 1908 and to whom Dudley devotes a chapter. What later authors added, the pinnacles, the challenges, the cycles, the personal year, is theirs, and this atlas's own numerology-position entries cite four different authors between 1908 and 1965 for what is presented as one system. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Origin of the NamePythagorean numerology is a twentieth-century label. The system it names has no demonstrable descent from Pythagoras, from the Pythagorean societies, or from the ancient arithmological literature; the letter-value chart it rests on was drawn up in the United States after 1900. The name borrows a pedigree, the oldest move in the subject. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryLargely abandoned as a comparative category 1 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseNumerology has been sold since Balliett as a basis for decisions: which name to take, which date to marry on, which house number to buy. Dudley's survey of what numerologists sell is the standard critical account and its finding is blunt, numbers have power over minds, not over events. These entries record what the tradition says, not advice. 1 Modern Numerology
Reduction in the Modern SystemThe modern system reduces every number above nine by adding its digits: 5 + 6 = 11, then 1 + 1 = 2. Whatever the system says of 56 it therefore says of 2, because it holds no separate doctrine for the higher numbers. The stated exceptions are 11, 22 and 33, which it leaves unreduced and calls master numbers. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceFour suits of fourteen cards give the fifty-six suit cards of the tarot pack, to which the trumps and the fool were added. Dummett's history shows the pack began as equipment for a trick-taking game in fifteenth-century Italy, and that its suit structure is that of the ordinary Italian pack. 3Tradition: The tarot pack Learn More
The Aubrey Holes
Fifty-six is seven times eight and reduces to eleven and then two. Its most discussed occurrence is archaeological: the ring of fifty-six chalk pits at Stonehenge, named the Aubrey holes after the seventeenth-century antiquary John Aubrey who first noted them, dating to the earliest phase of the monument. The astronomer Fred Hoyle and others proposed that the fifty-six holes served as an eclipse-prediction device, markers moved around the ring to track the lunar and solar cycles, a hypothesis that is ingenious and much cited but remains unproven; the actual purpose of the holes is still unknown, though several held cremated remains.
Fifty-six falls outside the ten-to-fifty-two range of Cheiro's 1926 compound-number scheme, so this atlas reports no reading attributed to his book; Balliett's 1908 chart reduces it instead to two, by way of eleven, partnership and diplomacy in the standard modern keyword list, a reading with no bearing on the archaeological debate over the Aubrey holes and Fred Hoyle's eclipse-prediction hypothesis already described above. In chemistry, fifty-six is the atomic number of barium, an element whose name comes from the Greek barys, heavy, and whose compounds are used today as the radio-opaque barium meal patients swallow before an X-ray of the digestive tract, a modern medical use unconnected to the Neolithic monument discussed above.
What the Systems Assign
Beyond the Aubrey holes, fifty-six has little traditional weight; the older symbolic systems, which developed seven and eight richly, did not much develop their product. Modern numerology reduces it to eleven, so some schemes credit it with the intuitive charge of that master number before its resolution to two. The responsible summary is that fifty-six is remembered chiefly for a prehistoric ring of pits whose meaning archaeology has not settled, and that the eclipse hypothesis, however elegant, is a modern conjecture rather than an established fact.
The digit six within fifty-six carries a favourable near-homophone in Chinese numerology, liu sounding close to both liu, flow, and liu, smooth or slick, part of why six is generally read as an auspicious digit in Chinese numbering; the association is entirely modern and linguistic and has no bearing on the far older, unresolved archaeological question of what the fifty-six Aubrey holes at Stonehenge were actually built to do. Mathematically, fifty-six is a binomial coefficient of some elegance: it is the number of ways to choose three items from a set of eight, eight choose three, a figure combinatorics uses constantly and one with no connection to either the Aubrey holes or Chinese numerology. Combinatorial counts of this kind underpin odds calculations in card games and lotteries alike, a thoroughly modern application of a number this atlas otherwise treats as symbolically undeveloped.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Four suits of fourteen cards give the fifty-six suit cards of the tarot pack, the structure it shares with the ordinary Italian pack.
Disciplines That Use This
The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.