Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Open Question

Does the ganzfeld effect survive a pre-registered multi-laboratory replication meeting the standard set in the 1986 Hyman-Honorton communique?

Open Question

Hyman and Honorton wrote down, jointly and in advance, what a decisive ganzfeld study would look like. No series run since has been accepted by both sides as meeting it. Two later meta-analyses, Milton and Wiseman in 1999 and Storm, Tressoldi and Di Risio in 2010, reach opposite conclusions on differently defined study pools, so the accumulated literature cannot settle it either.

What would resolve this A pre-registered adversarial collaboration with laboratories on both sides of the dispute, an analysis plan agreed and lodged before data collection, and a commitment from all parties to publish whatever results.
OpenExperimental psychology; meta-analysis; pre-registration methodologyRay Hyman, Charles Honorton, A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversy
Connections

Discipline Needed

Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honorton
Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honorton
Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honorton

Question On

Source A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld ControversyRay Hyman, Charles Honorton
Sources
A Joint Communique: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversy
Ray Hyman, Charles Honorton, Journal of Parapsychology, Vol. 50, 1986
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.