Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Open Questions

Does the Thor's hammer amulet predate the ninth century, or does the practice begin in the conversion period?

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Open Question

Effectively the entire corpus of around a thousand pendants falls in the ninth to eleventh centuries. That is also the conversion period, so the distribution is compatible both with an old practice becoming archaeologically visible and with a practice that begins as a response to Christian cross-wearing. No securely dated earlier example has been published, and no positive account of an earlier phase exists, so this is an evidential gap rather than a contest between established positions.

What would resolve this A hammer pendant, or a mould for one, recovered from a securely dated context earlier than the ninth century, or a systematic re-examination and re-dating of the existing corpus establishing that no such context exists.
OpenViking Age and Migration Period archaeology, with finds dating and metalwork typologyJohn Lindow, Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs
Cross-Tradition Connections

Question On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.