A hammer pendant is a small metal or amber hammer worn on a cord or a ring at the neck, with a short handle and a broad head, often decorated with punched or stamped ornament. Around a thousand are known from Viking Age contexts, which makes the type the single largest body of physical evidence for the worship of Thor. They come from graves, from hoards and from settlement layers, and they are not confined to Scandinavia: examples turn up along the eastern river routes, in the Danelaw and in Iceland. The name Mjollnir, for Thor's hammer in the mythology, comes from the written sources rather than from anything on the objects themselves, and no pendant carries an inscription naming it.
Facts
Disputed
Scholarly NoteWhether the pendant was worn in answer to Christian cross-wearing, or is an older practice that becomes visible in the conversion period, is argued both ways; a mould from Trendgarden in Jutland that cuts a hammer and a cross in one block is cited in support of each 1 Thor's hammer pendants, worn as amulets across the Viking Age Norse world, are read by some scholars as straightforward devotional objects invoking Thor's protection and by others as objects whose wearing became a deliberately visible response to the spread of Christian cross pendants in the same period, a pagan counter-symbol rather than an older, unselfconscious custom. John Lindow's Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs (2001) records that a soapstone mould found at Trendgarden, Denmark, capable of casting both a hammer and a cross pendant from the same workshop, is claimed as evidence by both readings, read either as evidence of a syncretic milieu supporting the counter-symbol reading or as evidence that both symbols were simply available consumer forms without ideological charge. The method is archaeological and art-historical, examining the distribution, findspots and manufacturing context of surviving pendants. Because the same physical evidence supports both readings depending on the interpretive frame, both retain active advocates. Use
Who May Handle ItAnyone; it is offered to the public 1 ConsecrationNot consecrated; an instrument, not a consecrated object 1 Physical Form
MaterialSilver, bronze, iron and amber, decorated with punched dots, stamped triangles or filigree 2 Open Questions
Origin PeriodWhether the hammer amulet predates the ninth century is not established 1 Effectively the whole corpus is ninth to eleventh century. No securely dated earlier example has been published and no positive account of an earlier practice exists, so the absence cannot at present be told from a genuine beginning. Identity
Also Known AsMjolnir pendant; Torshammer; hammer amulet 1 Category of Sacred ObjectA small metal or amber hammer worn at the neck, of which around a thousand are known from Viking Age contexts 1Tradition: Norse religion Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseModern Asatru and Forn Sidr practitioners wear the hammer as an emblem; this is a twentieth century reconstruction and not a continuation, and the same symbol has been taken up by racist groups whom mainstream heathen bodies have publicly repudiated 3 Sources
Textual NoteThe name Mjollnir comes from the Eddic and Icelandic written sources, not from the objects; no pendant carries an inscription naming it 4Tradition: Norse religion Learn More
A Thousand Small Hammers
If you want to know what people in Viking Age Scandinavia actually did, rather than what thirteenth century Icelanders wrote about what their ancestors did, the hammer pendant is one of the few places to look. Around a thousand survive. They are small, rarely more than a few centimetres, with a short handle and a wide flat head, cast or cut from silver, bronze, iron or amber, and often ornamented with punched dots, stamped triangles or filigree. They hang from a neck ring or a cord, sometimes several to a ring, sometimes alongside beads and other pendants. They come from graves, from silver hoards buried and not recovered, and from settlement soil, which means they were worn by living people and not simply provided for the dead.
The distribution goes well beyond Scandinavia: examples are known from the Baltic coast, from the river routes east into Russia, from the Danelaw in England and from Iceland. That is the geography of Scandinavian travel and settlement, and the pendants track it. What no pendant carries is a label. None is inscribed with the name Mjollnir or with the name of Thor. The identification rests on shape, on Thor's prominence in the written mythology, and on a small number of finds where a hammer appears in company with imagery that supports the reading. It is a strong identification but it is an inference, and it is worth keeping the two categories of evidence separate.
The Mould at Trendgarden, and Who Wears One Now
The dating is the interesting part. Hammer pendants cluster in the ninth to eleventh centuries, which is precisely the period in which Scandinavia was converting to Christianity, and that has generated a long argument about cause. One reading is that wearing a hammer was a response to wearing a cross, a way of saying whose side you were on in the same visual language, so the practice is a product of the encounter rather than an ancient custom. Another is that the amulet is older and simply becomes visible when silver becomes plentiful and burial practice changes. A soapstone mould from Trendgarden in Jutland is cited in every version of this discussion, because a single block cuts both a hammer and a cross, and it will support either conclusion: a smith serving two markets, or one market that had not yet decided.
The pendant has a second life. Modern Asatru, Forn Sidr and related heathen organisations, which took shape in Iceland, Scandinavia, Britain and North America from the 1970s onward, use the hammer as their most recognisable emblem, and members wear it. That is a reconstruction, built from the medieval texts and the archaeology by people who were quite open about building it, and it is a different thing from the religion of the ninth century. It is also contested internally, because the same symbol has been taken up by racist groups whom the mainstream heathen bodies have repudiated in explicit public statements. A modern hammer is therefore not evidence about the Viking Age, and it should not be read as one.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Thor, Deities The pendant is the hammer Mjollnir, the weapon of Thor.
Belongs to Tradition
Modern Heathen practice has taken the pendant up again as a worn sign.
Hammer pendants are found in graves and hoards across the Viking Age north.
Composed Of
Silver, Metals Surviving pendants are of silver, bronze, iron and amber.
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
Does the Thor's hammer amulet predate the ninth century, or does the practice begin in the conversion period?
Effectively the entire corpus of around a thousand pendants falls in the ninth to eleventh centuries. That is also the conversion period, so the distribution is compatible both with an old practice becoming archaeologically visible and with a practice that begins as a response to Christian cross-wearing. No securely dated earlier example has been published, and no positive account of an earlier phase exists, so this is an evidential gap rather than a contest between established positions.
What would resolve this A hammer pendant, or a mould for one, recovered from a securely dated context earlier than the ninth century, or a systematic re-examination and re-dating of the existing corpus establishing that no such context exists.
Viking Age and Migration Period archaeology, with finds dating and metalwork typologyJohn Lindow, Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.