Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Other Writings

Summa Theologiae

Also Known As Summa · Summa Theologica
Theological Treatises

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Summa Theologiae is the masterwork of Thomas Aquinas, begun around 1265 as a complete course of Christian theology and left unfinished at his death in 1274. Written in scholastic Latin, it moves in three great parts from God and creation, through the human journey toward God in virtue and vice, law and grace, to Christ and the sacraments as the way of return. Its method is as famous as its content: thousands of articles, each opening with objections, answering them from authority and reason, and disposing of each in turn. The five ways of demonstrating the existence of God appear near its opening. It became the central reference of Catholic theology and the foundational text of the Thomist tradition.

Facts
Origins
Era of Composition
1265 to 1274 1
Era of Composition
Composed c. 1265-1273 CE, unfinished 1
Language
Latin 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Thomas Aquinas 1
Text
Literary Form
Systematic Theology 1
Literary Form Detail
A systematic theological summa organized as a sequence of questions and articles, each stating objections, a counterargument, Aquinas's own resolution and replies to the objections in turn. 1
Structure
Structure
Three parts in articles of disputed-question form, with a posthumous Supplement 1
Learn More
The Architecture of the Summa

Aquinas designed the Summa, he says in its prologue, for beginners, having found the existing textbooks repetitive and disordered. His remedy was architecture. The First Part treats God in himself, the Trinity, and the procession of creatures from God, including the long treatises on angels and on human nature that made it a compendium of medieval psychology. The Second Part, so large it is divided in two, turns to the movement of the rational creature back toward God: first the general structure of human action, happiness, the passions, habit, virtue, sin, law and grace, then a detailed anatomy of particular virtues and vices, organised around the three theological and four cardinal virtues. The Third Part treats Christ, the sacraments as extensions of the Incarnation, and was to end in the resurrection and last things when death interrupted the work; disciples completed the plan as a Supplement drawn from his earlier writings.

The unit throughout is the article, framed as a disputed question. Each opens with the strongest objections Aquinas can muster against the position he will take, then a countervailing authority, then his own determination, and finally a reply to every objection, a form that obliges the author to inhabit his opponents' arguments before answering them, and that gives the Summa its enduring reputation for intellectual fairness.

The Unfinished Ending and the Long Afterlife

On the feast of Saint Nicholas, 6 December 1273, Aquinas underwent an experience while celebrating Mass in Naples after which he stopped writing altogether. Pressed by his companion Reginald of Piperno to continue, he answered, in the account transmitted by the early biographers, that after what he had seen everything he had written seemed to him as straw. The Summa broke off in the middle of the treatise on penance, and Aquinas died three months later on the way to the Council of Lyon. The work's afterlife was turbulent before it was triumphant.

In 1277 the bishop of Paris condemned a list of propositions that touched positions associated with Aquinas; the condemnation was later annulled for his teaching, and his canonisation in 1323 settled his orthodoxy. The Dominican order adopted his doctrine, and by the sixteenth century the Summa had displaced Peter Lombard's Sentences as the text on which theologians lectured, with commentators such as Cajetan writing at its side.

At the Council of Trent it stood among the works consulted on doctrine, and in 1879 the encyclical Aeterni Patris made Thomism the recommended framework of Catholic philosophy, securing the Summa's place at the centre of seminary education. Its questions on law, conscience and just war remain live references in ethics well beyond theology.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Attests

Just War, Doctrines

Summa Theologiae, second part of the second part, question 40.

Authored By

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Belongs to Tradition

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Element Of

Anglicanism, Denominations

Anglican divinity has read Aquinas since Hooker without binding itself to him, so the work is a resource of the tradition rather than a standard within it.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Leo XIII prescribed the teaching of Thomas Aquinas as the ground of Catholic philosophy and theology in 1879, and the Summa held that place in seminary formation for most of the century that followed.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Critiqued Here

Calvinism (Reformed), Denominations

Reformed teaching reads Aquinas as a source to be argued with rather than deferred to, and refuses the authority the Roman church gives him.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Eastern Orthodoxy, Denominations

Orthodox theology has generally treated the scholastic method as a departure, and the fourteenth century settlement on the divine essence and energies stands as the Eastern answer to the questions Western scholasticism was putting.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Lutheranism, Denominations

Luther's disputation against scholastic theology of 1517 attacked the whole method this work perfected, holding that the reception of Aristotle had corrupted the doctrine of grace at its root.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.