Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Dress & Vestments

Chasuble

Also Known As Casula · phelonion · Casula, phelonion
Vestments

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 300 to 400 CE

The outermost vestment at the Eucharist, a wide sleeveless garment falling over the shoulders, worn over the alb and stole. Its restriction is absolute and it is the clearest example of how liturgical dress works: only a priest or bishop wears it, and only when actually celebrating. A priest attending a Mass someone else is celebrating does not put one on. A deacon never wears one; the dalmatic is his.

Its colour follows the liturgical season, white for Christmas and Easter, red for Pentecost and martyrs, green through ordinary time, violet in Advent and Lent, so the garment tells the congregation where they are in the year as well as who is at the altar.

Facts
Practice
Obligation
Obligatory on those who meet its conditions 2Tradition: Roman Catholicism
Sourced to the subject's own accountRequired of the priest or bishop celebrating Mass
Attributions
Tradition
Christianity, principally Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican and Lutheran 1
Origins
Origin Period
300 to 400 CE 1
Learn More
The Vestment That Tells You Exactly What Is Happening

The chasuble is the clearest working example of how liturgical dress functions as a code that a congregation can read.

Absolute restriction

The chasuble is the outermost Eucharistic vestment, worn over the alb and stole, and its restriction is total: only a priest or bishop wears one, and only when actually celebrating the Eucharist. A priest merely attending a Mass someone else celebrates does not put one on, and a deacon never wears one, the dalmatic being his. Simply seeing who is wearing a chasuble tells the congregation who is at the altar and that the Eucharist, and not some other service, is being celebrated.

Colour as calendar

Its colour follows the liturgical season, white for Christmas and Easter, red for Pentecost and martyrs, green through ordinary time, violet in Advent and Lent, so the garment also tells the congregation where they stand in the year. The shape has swung between extremes, from the full conical form of late antiquity to the stiff cut-back fiddleback of the baroque and back again under the twentieth-century liturgical movement, and the argument between the two shapes is still running in some parishes.

The Gothic and the Roman, and an Argument About a Shape

The chasuble began as the paenula, a conical travelling cloak of the Roman world with a hole for the head, worn by everybody. In its original form it fell to the wrists and had to be gathered up over the arms to free the hands, which is why medieval illustrations show servers lifting the celebrant's vestment at the elevation.

Over several centuries the sides were cut away to solve that inconvenience, and the cutting went a long way. By the Baroque period the Roman form had become two stiff boards of ornamented fabric hanging front and back over the shoulders, with no material over the arms at all, a shape known in English as the fiddleback for the outline of its front panel. It carried heavy embroidery well and it was practical, and it became the norm across the Catholic world.

The nineteenth century liturgical movement objected. Reformers, including Augustus Pugin in England, argued that the full conical or ample Gothic form was the authentic garment and that the fiddleback was a mutilation, and they revived the older cut. Rome was initially unenthusiastic and restricted the revival, then relaxed, and by the middle of the twentieth century the fuller shapes were general. The argument has not gone away: the fiddleback returned to use in traditionalist celebrations and is now a visible marker of liturgical allegiance rather than a neutral choice of tailoring.

The chasuble carries the liturgical colour, and this is where the colour system is most visible: white or gold for feasts and the seasons of Christmas and Easter, red for martyrs and Pentecost, green for ordinary time, violet for Advent and Lent, and rose on two Sundays. Black survives for requiems in some places.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source General Instruction of the Roman Missal, third typical editionCongregation for Divine Worshipthe holders' own account

Contrasts With

Adopted deliberately in place of the chasuble and the vestments that go with it.

The sakkos replaced the chasuble and its Eastern equivalent for bishops, leaving the phelonion to priests.

Element Of

Anglicanism, Denominations

Use divides by churchmanship rather than by the formularies: ordinary in Anglo-Catholic parishes, absent in the evangelical tradition, and never required of the communion as a whole.

Lutheranism, Denominations

Never abolished and never made general. The chasuble is ordinary in the Scandinavian churches and in high church parishes elsewhere, and unknown in others, without either practice being held to say anything about the sacrament.

The chasuble is the vestment proper to the priest celebrant at Mass in the Roman rite, worn over the alb and stole.

Source General Instruction of the Roman Missal, third typical editionCongregation for Divine Worshipthe holders' own account

Rejected Here

Calvinism (Reformed), Denominations

The eucharistic vestments went out with the sacrifice of the Mass they clothed. Reformed order recognises no priest at an altar and therefore no garment for one.

Held Differently

Eastern Orthodoxy, Denominations

The outer eucharistic vestment of a Byzantine priest is the phelonion, a full cone cut away at the front and hanging long behind, not the shaped Latin chasuble.

Source The Byzantine Rite: A Short HistoryRobert F. Taft

Related To

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

A bishop wears the dalmatic beneath the chasuble at a solemn pontifical liturgy.

Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005on the chasuble, its restriction and the liturgical coloursView the Source
2. General Instruction of the Roman Missal, third typical edition
Congregation for Divine Worship, Congregation for Divine Worship, 2002Nos. 337, 346the holders' own accountView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.