Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Symbols

Taijitu

Diagram

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1370 to 1379

The interlocking black and white teardrops are a late image for a very old idea. Yin and yang as complementary and alternating principles are argued in Warring States texts and in the commentaries attached to the Book of Changes, centuries before any diagram. Zhou Dunyi's eleventh-century Explanation of the Diagram of the Supreme Polarity gave the concept a famous chart, but his figure is a stack of concentric bands and does not look like this at all. The familiar swirl, with each half carrying a dot of its opposite, is usually attributed to Zhao Huiqian in the fourteenth century. Its use as a general emblem of Taoism, and its later career on flags and album covers, is more recent still.

Facts
Debunked
Origin Period
And the familiar swirling diagram first appears in Zhao Huiqian's Liushu benyi in the 1370s 1
The Encyclopedia of Taoism, edited by Fabrizio Pregadio, Routledge, 2008, traces the familiar divided black-and-white swirl diagram to its first documented appearance in Zhao Huiqian's Liushu benyi, dated to the 1370s, and distinguishes it carefully from two older things it is often confused with: yin and yang as complementary, alternating principles, argued in Warring States period texts centuries earlier, and Zhou Dunyi's eleventh century Taijitu, an entirely different diagram of layered circles rather than a divided one. The encyclopedia's method is art historical and textual, tracing the specific diagram's appearances in dated primary sources rather than the philosophical concept's own separate history, and it finds no appearance of this diagram before the 1370s. The idea of yin and yang is genuinely ancient; the now-familiar picture of it is late medieval, and treating the picture as equally ancient projects the concept's age onto an image that does not share it.
Origin Period
The idea is far older than the picture 1
The Encyclopedia of Taoism, edited by Fabrizio Pregadio, Routledge, 2008, traces the familiar divided black-and-white swirl diagram to its first documented appearance in Zhao Huiqian's Liushu benyi, dated to the 1370s, and distinguishes it carefully from two older things it is often confused with: yin and yang as complementary, alternating principles, argued in Warring States period texts centuries earlier, and Zhou Dunyi's eleventh century Taijitu, an entirely different diagram of layered circles rather than a divided one. The encyclopedia's method is art historical and textual, tracing the specific diagram's appearances in dated primary sources rather than the philosophical concept's own separate history, and it finds no appearance of this diagram before the 1370s. The idea of yin and yang is genuinely ancient; the now-familiar picture of it is late medieval, and treating the picture as equally ancient projects the concept's age onto an image that does not share it.
Origin Period
Yin and yang as complementary and alternating principles are argued in Warring States texts 1
The Encyclopedia of Taoism, edited by Fabrizio Pregadio, Routledge, 2008, traces the familiar divided black-and-white swirl diagram to its first documented appearance in Zhao Huiqian's Liushu benyi, dated to the 1370s, and distinguishes it carefully from two older things it is often confused with: yin and yang as complementary, alternating principles, argued in Warring States period texts centuries earlier, and Zhou Dunyi's eleventh century Taijitu, an entirely different diagram of layered circles rather than a divided one. The encyclopedia's method is art historical and textual, tracing the specific diagram's appearances in dated primary sources rather than the philosophical concept's own separate history, and it finds no appearance of this diagram before the 1370s. The idea of yin and yang is genuinely ancient; the now-familiar picture of it is late medieval, and treating the picture as equally ancient projects the concept's age onto an image that does not share it.
Origin Period
Zhou Dunyi's eleventh-century Taijitu is a different, layered figure 1
The Encyclopedia of Taoism, edited by Fabrizio Pregadio, Routledge, 2008, traces the familiar divided black-and-white swirl diagram to its first documented appearance in Zhao Huiqian's Liushu benyi, dated to the 1370s, and distinguishes it carefully from two older things it is often confused with: yin and yang as complementary, alternating principles, argued in Warring States period texts centuries earlier, and Zhou Dunyi's eleventh century Taijitu, an entirely different diagram of layered circles rather than a divided one. The encyclopedia's method is art historical and textual, tracing the specific diagram's appearances in dated primary sources rather than the philosophical concept's own separate history, and it finds no appearance of this diagram before the 1370s. The idea of yin and yang is genuinely ancient; the now-familiar picture of it is late medieval, and treating the picture as equally ancient projects the concept's age onto an image that does not share it.
Origins
Origin Period
1370 to 1379 1
Dates the familiar swirling diagram itself, per its own text: "the familiar swirling diagram first appears in Zhao Huiqian's Liushu benyi in the 1370s", distinct from Zhou Dunyi's different eleventh-century figure and the older undated idea.
Place of Origin
China. 1
Adopted as an Emblem
General emblem of modern Taoism 1
Form
Type of Symbol
Cosmological or ritual diagram 1
Geometric Form
A circle divided by an S-curve into a black and a white field, each carrying a dot of the other colour. 1
Learn More
The Idea Is Old; The Picture Is Not

It is essential to separate the concept from the diagram, because they are separated by well over a thousand years.

Yin and yang as a pair of complementary, alternating, mutually generating aspects is argued for in Chinese texts of the Warring States period and is fully developed in the commentarial layers attached to the Book of Changes, particularly the Great Commentary, and in the correlative cosmology of the Han. The core claims are that the two are not opposed forces but phases of one process, that each contains the seed of the other, and that neither is good or evil. Yin is the shaded side of a hill, yang the sunlit side; the metaphor is topographical and the terms are relative, so the same thing is yin in one relation and yang in another.

None of this required a picture, and for centuries there was not one.

The Diagram of the Supreme Polarity produced by Zhou Dunyi in the eleventh century is the famous early chart, and it is genuinely important: its accompanying explanation became a foundational text of Neo-Confucian metaphysics, tracing the generation of the five phases and the ten thousand things from the supreme polarity. But Zhou Dunyi's diagram is a vertical stack of concentric circles and half-shaded bands. It does not look remotely like the symbol now called by that name, and reproductions captioning the modern swirl with his name are simply wrong.

The Swirl, and Its Export

The familiar figure, two interlocking teardrops, each carrying a dot of the other's colour, in a circle, is late. It is usually attributed to Zhao Huiqian in the fourteenth century, and is sometimes called the xiantian taiji tu, the diagram of the supreme polarity prior to heaven. The attribution is the standard one but it is a matter of textual scholarship rather than a documented signature.

The design is remarkably good, which explains its survival. Three claims of the underlying philosophy are stated by the drawing itself and not by any caption: the two halves are equal in area, so neither dominates; the boundary between them is a curve rather than a line, so each is continuously becoming the other rather than confronting it; and each contains a spot of its opposite, so nothing is ever purely one thing. A person who has only seen the figure has already absorbed the substance of the doctrine.

Its adoption as the general emblem of Taoism is later still and is partly a Western convenience, in the way that a cross serves for Christianity. Chinese religious practice did not depend on it, and it also circulates in Confucian, medical and divinatory contexts that are not Taoist at all.

Its modern career is extraordinary and largely detached from any of this. It appears on the flag of South Korea in a modified form, on unit insignia, on packaging, and as a general shorthand for balance. Along the way the relational and processual sense of yin and yang has commonly been flattened into a static opposition of male and female or good and evil, which is close to the reverse of what the classical texts argue.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Tai Chi, Disciplines

The taiji of taijiquan is the polarity the taijitu diagrams

The taiji of taijiquan is the polarity the taijitu diagrams

Belongs to Tradition

Symbol Of

Taoism, Religions

The taijitu (yin-yang diagram) symbolizes the complementary polarity of yin and yang in Taoist cosmology.

Source The Encyclopedia of TaoismFabrizio Pregadio (ed.)
Sources
1. The Encyclopedia of Taoism
Fabrizio Pregadio (ed.), Routledge, 2008from the symbol's own description, on its modern useView the Source
Taijitu shuo (Explanation of the Diagram of the Supreme Polarity)
Zhou DunyiThe diagram accompanying the Explanation of the Diagram of the Supreme Polarity
Quote, The diagram accompanying the Explanation of the Diagram of the Supreme Polarity
The eleventh-century diagram of the supreme polarity is a vertical arrangement of concentric circles and half-shaded bands, and does not resemble the modern interlocking-teardrop figure that now carries its name.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.