Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Biblical Studies

Humanities

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1678

The biblical text's composition tested against internal evidence rather than assumed from tradition, opened by Richard Simon's 1678 Histoire critique du Vieux Testament, condemned and burned in its own time for questioning Mosaic authorship of the Torah.

Facts
Subject
Subject
the composition history of the biblical text, including the authorship, date and sources of its individual books, tested against internal evidence rather than assumed from tradition 2
Method
Method
historical critical analysis of when and by whom a biblical book was actually composed, testing internal textual evidence against the book's own traditional attribution 2
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
Religious Studies 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1678 2
Learn More
Richard Simon Asks Who Actually Wrote the Torah and Is Condemned for Asking

Biblical studies applies historical and critical method to the composition of the biblical text, asking when a book was actually written and by whom, testing internal evidence, style, vocabulary, apparent inconsistency, against the book's own traditional attribution rather than assuming that attribution is accurate. The French Catholic priest Richard Simon opened the modern discipline with his Histoire critique du Vieux Testament, published in 1678, which argued from internal textual evidence that the Pentateuch could not have been written entirely by Moses as tradition held, a conclusion that got the book condemned and burned by the French church even as it set the terms historical critical biblical scholarship has worked from ever since.

The question Simon raised, whether a book's traditional attribution matches what the text's own internal evidence supports, is exactly what the atlas needs answered wherever a scripture's authorship or date of composition bears on a claim about its historical reliability or theological development. The atlas relies on the discipline's findings to distinguish a book's traditional attribution from what the documented critical scholarship on its composition actually establishes.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Branch Of

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.