Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Central Asian Archaeology

Social Science

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1900

The excavation of Silk Road oasis cities and cave complexes, opened by Aurel Stein's first expedition in 1900, which recovered thousands of Buddhist, Manichaean and Nestorian Christian manuscripts. Documents where these traditions met and mixed along the trade routes.

Facts
Method
Method
expedition based survey and excavation of Silk Road oasis sites, recovering manuscripts, wall paintings and artifacts from a region where surviving textual sources are sparse and multilingual 2
Subject
Subject
the Buddhist, Manichaean, Zoroastrian and Nestorian Christian material culture of the Silk Road oasis cities, recovered largely through early twentieth century expedition archaeology 2
Identity
Field Category
Social science 1
Parent Field
Archaeology 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1900 2
Learn More
Aurel Stein Sets Out Across the Taklamakan and a Buried Silk Road Reappears

Central Asian archaeology excavates the oasis cities and cave complexes strung along the Silk Road through the Taklamakan Desert and the Tarim Basin, recovering manuscripts, wall paintings and artifacts from a region whose surviving textual record is otherwise thin and scattered across many languages. The Hungarian born British archaeologist Aurel Stein opened the field with his first Central Asian expedition, 1900 to 1901, which reached Dandan Oilik and other sites in the Khotan oasis region. His second Central Asian expedition, 1906 to 1908, reached Dunhuang in 1907 and recovered the sealed manuscript cache at the Mogao Caves, thousands of Buddhist, Manichaean and other religious texts and artworks that had lain undisturbed for centuries.

The oasis cities Stein and later expeditions uncovered were meeting points where Buddhism, Manichaeism, Zoroastrianism and Nestorian Christianity coexisted and influenced one another along the same trade routes, a religious mixture the excavated material documents directly in multiple languages and scripts. The atlas draws on Central Asian archaeology wherever a claim concerns the spread of a religion along the Silk Road or contact between traditions that met in these oasis cities, since the excavated manuscripts are frequently the only surviving record of communities whose own histories were not otherwise preserved.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Branch Of

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.