Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Ethnopharmacology

Natural Science

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1967

Traditional and ritual medicine tested against measured pharmacological activity, named at a 1967 San Francisco conference organized by Efron, Holmstedt and Kline. Checks whether a shamanic or entheogenic plant claim corresponds to a documented biological effect.

Facts
Method
Method
combined ethnographic fieldwork and laboratory pharmacological testing of plant and animal substances a community uses medicinally or ritually, checking traditional use claims against measured biological activity 2
Subject
Subject
the pharmacological activity of substances used in traditional and ritual medicine, and whether a claimed healing or entheogenic effect is measurable 2
Identity
Field Category
Natural science 1
Parent Field
Pharmacology 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1967 2
Learn More
A San Francisco Conference Names the Study of Medicine People Actually Use

Ethnopharmacology combines ethnographic fieldwork among the people who use a traditional medicine or ritual substance with laboratory testing of that substance's actual pharmacological activity, checking a traditional healing or entheogenic claim against measured biological effect rather than accepting or dismissing it on its own terms. The field took its name and its first organized statement from a 1967 conference in San Francisco on the ethnopharmacologic search for psychoactive drugs, organized by Daniel Efron, Bo Holmstedt and Nathan Kline, which brought pharmacologists and anthropologists together to study traditional psychoactive plant use as a serious joint subject for the first time.

Ritual healing practice, shamanic plant medicine and entheogenic sacrament use appear across many traditions with specific claimed effects, and ethnopharmacology is what lets the atlas say whether a named plant's traditional use corresponds to a documented pharmacological action, distinct from whether the tradition's own account of why it works, spiritual, humoral or otherwise, is itself testable. The atlas cites ethnopharmacological findings wherever a tradition's medicinal or entheogenic plant claim can be checked against laboratory evidence.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Branch Of

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.