Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Scripture Portion

Haftarah for Mishpatim

Tanakh

The fixed prophetic reading recited alongside Parashah Mishpatim in the standard Ashkenazi annual Torah reading cycle, drawn from the book of Jeremiah. It is read after the Torah reading on the Sabbath of that portion, framed by blessings of its own before and after, and chosen for a link to its Torah portion, commonly a shared phrase, image or theme, rather than because it continues the scriptural sequence. Which passage is paired with a given portion is not uniform: the Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Yemenite and Italian rites differ from one another, and a special Sabbath can displace the pairing altogether.

Facts
Reckoning
Date Rule
Drawn from the book of Jeremiah in the Ashkenazi rite 1
Date Rule
Read after the Torah reading on the Sabbath of its portion, and enclosed in blessings of its own before and after 1
Date Rule
The passage is chosen for a link to the Torah portion, commonly a shared phrase, image or theme, rather than because it continues the sequence 1
Date Rule
Which passage is paired with a given portion is not uniform. The Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Yemenite and Italian rites differ from one another, a portion read together with its neighbour in a common year can take a different reading from the one it takes when read alone, and a special Sabbath displaces the pairing altogether 1
Identity
Parent Work
Nevi'im 1
Position in the Canon
Haftarah paired with Parashah 18, Mishpatim 1
Origins
Language
Biblical Hebrew 1
Canonicity (class)
Canonical 2
Literary form (class)
Prophetic literature 3
Learn More
A Covenant to Free Slaves, Made and Then Broken

This haftarah opens with King Zedekiah making a covenant with the people of Jerusalem during the Babylonian siege to release their Hebrew slaves, a measure carried out publicly and solemnly, every slaveholder freeing the men and women who had served them, in apparent fulfillment of an ancient law requiring such release after a set term of service.

The relief the siege had briefly granted then leads the same slaveholders to change their minds and force the freed men and women back into servitude, a reversal Jeremiah condemns sharply, recalling that God had made a covenant with their ancestors specifically requiring release of Hebrew slaves after six years of service, a covenant this generation had briefly honored under pressure only to break it again once the immediate danger seemed to ease.

The haftarah closes with a shorter, separate passage affirming that just as the fixed laws of heaven and earth, day and night, cannot be broken, God will not reject the descendants of Jacob and David, closing a prophecy of judgment for broken faith with a reassurance that God's own faithfulness remains unbroken regardless.

Zedekiah's brief compliance under the pressure of the siege, followed by reversal once the pressure eased, gives this haftarah an unusually candid portrait of a whole community rediscovering an old law only under duress, a caution the tradition reads as relevant well beyond the specific historical siege it describes.

The Very Law of Release Named in Both Texts

The pairing with Parashah Mishpatim, whose opening laws set out the terms under which a Hebrew slave must be released after six years of service, rests on a direct legal match: the haftarah's entire crisis turns on this exact law, cited by Jeremiah as the ancient covenant Zedekiah's generation briefly honored and then violated once the emergency that had prompted their compliance appeared to pass.

Where the parashah presents the law in its original, straightforward form, a fixed term of service followed by release, the haftarah shows how easily such a law can be honored only under duress and abandoned the moment convenience returns, giving the abstract legal instruction of Mishpatim a concrete, cautionary illustration of exactly how it can fail in practice even after it has technically been fulfilled once.

The haftarah's closing reassurance that God's covenant with Jacob and David cannot be broken, unlike the slaveholders' own broken covenant, draws a pointed contrast between human faithfulness to a specific, testable law and divine faithfulness to a much larger promise, suggesting that the very people condemned for breaking one covenant can still rely on God's unbroken commitment to another.

Connections

Associated With

Fixed liturgical pairing: this haftarah is read alongside this parashah.

Source Judaism 101: Torah Readings and HaftarotTracey R. Rich

Attributed To

Jeremiah, Figures
Source Sefaria (JPS translation): Jeremiah 1:1

Authored By

Jeremiah, Figures
Source Sefaria (JPS translation): Jeremiah 1:1

Belongs to Tradition

Judaism, Religions
Source Hebcal Jewish Calendar: Parashat Mishpatim

Contained In

In Language

Originates in Language

Source Judaism 101: Torah Readings and HaftarotTracey R. Rich
Sources
1. Jewish Liturgy: A Comprehensive History
Ismar Elbogen, translated by Raymond P. Scheindlin, Jewish Publication Society and Jewish Theological Seminary, 1993View the Source
2. Judaism 101: Torah Readings and Haftarot
Tracey R. Rich, jewfaq.orgView the Source
3. Haftarah (Wikipedia)
Lead
Quote, Lead
is a series of selections from the books of Nevi'im ("Prophets") of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
View the Source
Hebcal Jewish Calendar: Parashat Mishpatim
Hebcal Jewish CalendarBelongs to Tradition: Judaism, Torah portion and haftarah readings
Quote, Belongs to Tradition: Judaism, Torah portion and haftarah readings
Parashat Mishpatim is the 18th weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading. ... Haftarah: Jeremiah 34:8-22 , 33:25-26
View the Source
Sefaria (JPS translation): Jeremiah 1:1
Sefaria (JPS translation)
  • Attributed To: Jeremiah, Jeremiah 1:1
    The words of Jeremiah son of Hilkiah, one of the priests at Anathoth in the territory of Benjamin.
  • Authored By: Jeremiah, Jeremiah 1:1
    The words of Jeremiah son of Hilkiah, one of the priests at Anathoth in the territory of Benjamin.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.