Scripture Portions
Shemini
Also Known As Sh'miniOriginal Term shemini (Hebrew, eighth)
Torah
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
On the eighth day, at the climax of the installation, Nadav and Avihu bring strange fire that was not commanded and are consumed by fire from before God, and Aaron's response is silence, vayidom Aharon, which the tradition has read as grief, as assent, and as an indictment the text declines to voice. No explanation of the offence is given and the commentators have supplied a dozen, from drunkenness to excessive zeal to acting without consulting Moses. The rest of the portion establishes the dietary laws: which land animals, water creatures, birds and insects may be eaten, given as classification rather than as reason. Rabbinic law developed the separation of meat and milk from a verse elsewhere, so kashrut as practised is not simply a reading of this chapter.
Facts
Reckoning
Date RuleIt is the 26th of the fifty-four parashiyot and covers Leviticus 9:1-11:47 1 Date RuleOn its appointed Sabbath in the annual Babylonian reading cycle 1 Date RuleRead as the weekly Torah portion (parashat ha-shavua) 1 Identity
Position in the Canon Canonical Reference Learn More
The Eighth Day: The Dietary Laws
In the synagogue the Torah is read aloud in a fixed annual cycle of fifty-four weekly portions (parashiyot), one each Shabbat morning, with certain adjacent portions doubled in ordinary years so the sequence fits the calendar. Each portion is named for a distinctive word near its opening and is paired with a haftarah, a reading from the Prophets. The cycle closes and restarts on Simchat Torah. Shemini ('The Eighth', Leviticus 9:1-11:47) tells of the eighth day dedicating the sanctuary, the sudden death of Aaron's sons Nadab and Abihu who offered 'strange fire,' and the laws of clean and unclean animals that form the basis of kashrut, the Jewish dietary code.
The deaths of Nadab and Abihu, consumed by fire after offering 'strange fire which He had not commanded' (Leviticus 10:1-2), is one of the Torah's most debated punitive episodes, with classical commentary offering markedly different explanations, some reading their fault as unauthorised innovation in ritual regardless of good intent, others, following a tradition noting the immediately following prohibition of priests serving while intoxicated (Leviticus 10:9), suggesting they had entered the sanctuary while drunk, and still others reading their death less as punishment than as an unusually intimate closeness to the divine presence that ordinary priestly service could not sustain. Aaron's silence after his sons' deaths, 'and Aaron was silent' (Leviticus 10:3), is read by rabbinic and later Jewish ethical literature as a model of restrained grief accepted without protest.
Names Time Has Made Uncertain
Shemini's list of forbidden birds (Leviticus 11:13-19) gives no defining criterion comparable to the split hoof and cud-chewing test for land animals or the fins and scales test for water creatures; it simply names roughly twenty species. Modern scholarship treats the identification of several of these Hebrew bird names with specific present-day species as genuinely uncertain, since the terms are rare, some appearing nowhere else in the Bible, and ancient translators, including those who produced the Greek Septuagint centuries before rabbinic tradition was fixed in writing, already disagreed on some renderings, so Jewish communities today transmit differing customary lists of traditionally kosher birds based on unbroken local practice as much as on the biblical names themselves.
Source critics attribute Shemini's dietary legislation, like the surrounding sacrificial law, to the Priestly source, and note that Leviticus 11's list of permitted and forbidden animals runs closely parallel, with some differences of detail and order, to a second list given later in Deuteronomy 14, a doubling read as evidence that the same core dietary tradition was preserved and transmitted independently within two law collections before being incorporated into the Torah's present five books.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Fixed liturgical pairing: this haftarah is read alongside this parashah.
Contained In
Originates in Language
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.