Scriptures & Texts
Midrash
Also Known As Midrashim
Commentaries
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Midrash is the rabbinic literature of scriptural interpretation, a genre spanning a shelf of collections compiled from late antiquity through the Middle Ages. The word comes from a root meaning to seek or inquire, and the enterprise is exactly that: pressing the biblical text, verse by verse and sometimes letter by letter, for law, for meaning and for story. Tradition divides the corpus into halakhic midrash, which derives law from the legal portions of the Torah, and aggadic midrash, which spins narrative, parable and homily from the whole of Scripture. Major collections include the Mekhilta, Sifra and Sifre among the earlier works and the great Midrash Rabbah cycle on the Torah and the Five Scrolls among the later ones.
Facts
Origins
Era of Compositionc. 3rd-12th centuries CE (collections) 1 Language Detail Attributed Author / CompilerAnonymous rabbinic compilers, across collections spanning late antiquity through the Middle Ages 1 Status
Canonical StatusCanonical 1Tradition: Judaism Canonical Status DetailFoundational (Rabbinic) 1Tradition: Judaism Structure
StructureHalakhic and aggadic collections, including Mekhilta, Sifra, Sifre and the Midrash Rabbah cycle 1 Text
Literary Form Literary Form DetailScriptural interpretation (genre) 1 Learn More
Law and Story: the Two Kinds of Midrash
The rabbis distinguished two registers of midrash by what the interpreter was seeking. Midrash halakhah works through the legal sections of the Torah and derives binding law from the precise wording of the verses, using formal hermeneutical rules such as the inference from minor to major and the analogy between identical phrases. The classical collections of this kind are tannaitic: the Mekhilta of Rabbi Ishmael on Exodus, the Sifra on Leviticus, and the Sifre on Numbers and Deuteronomy, each associated by scholars with one of the two early interpretive schools, those of Rabbi Ishmael and Rabbi Akiva.
Midrash aggadah, by contrast, seeks meaning rather than statute. It fills the silences of the biblical narrative, gives speeches to Abraham and arguments to Moses, reconciles contradictory verses through story, and turns Scripture toward consolation and moral exhortation. Its masterpieces include Genesis Rabbah, with its dense verse-by-verse weave, Leviticus Rabbah and Pesikta de-Rav Kahana, built as cycles of homilies for sabbaths and festivals, and the later Tanhuma family. The two registers were never sealed off from each other; legal collections carry stories and homiletic ones carry law, because for the rabbis the whole Torah, narrative and statute alike, was a single fabric to be searched.
The Collections and Their Centuries
Midrash is not one book but a library assembled over roughly a thousand years. The earliest surviving collections, the halakhic midrashim, preserve tannaitic material and reached their present form in the third and fourth centuries CE. The amoraic centuries in the Land of Israel produced the first great aggadic compilations: Genesis Rabbah is generally dated to the fifth century, close in time and idiom to the Jerusalem Talmud, and Leviticus Rabbah and Pesikta de-Rav Kahana to the same Palestinian milieu. Lamentations Rabbah gathered the tradition's response to catastrophe around the destroyed Temple and the failed revolts.
Later centuries added the Tanhuma-Yelammedenu literature, Ecclesiastes Rabbah and the rest of the Rabbah cycle on the Five Scrolls, the narrative retelling Pirkei de-Rabbi Eliezer in the eighth century, and eventually medieval anthologies such as Yalkut Shimoni, which excerpted the whole inheritance verse by verse across the entire Bible. The collections differ in language as well as date, moving from Mishnaic Hebrew with Galilean Aramaic toward a more literary medieval Hebrew. What binds the library together is a shared conviction that Scripture is inexhaustible: that every generation may return to the same verses with new questions and find that the text, pressed once more, answers.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Midrashic literature is held as authoritative rabbinic interpretation of scripture.
Midrashic literature is held as authoritative rabbinic interpretation of scripture.
Midrashic literature is held as authoritative rabbinic interpretation of scripture.
Midrashic literature is held as authoritative rabbinic interpretation of scripture.
Midrashic literature is held as authoritative rabbinic interpretation of scripture.
Midrashic literature is held as authoritative rabbinic interpretation of scripture.
Midrashic literature is held as authoritative rabbinic interpretation of scripture.
Midrashic literature is read as part of this stream's inherited civilization.
Midrashic literature is read as part of this stream's interpretive and homiletic heritage.
Critiqued By
Midrashic literature is formally rejected as an authority alongside the rest of the rabbinic corpus.
Disciplines That Use This
Found In
Related To
Works With
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.