Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Bantu Prophets in South Africa

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Bengt Sundkler was a missionary and scholar who studied African independent churches directly through fieldwork in South Africa, and this academic book, published by Oxford University Press for the International African Institute, was an early and influential study of prophetic and independent Christian movements among Bantu speaking communities. Its strength is firsthand documentation of a religious phenomenon that was, at the time, poorly recorded elsewhere, based on Sundkler's own observation of these churches and their leaders. Its limit, openly noted by later scholars, is that Sundkler wrote from a missionary background that shaped some of his interpretive framing of these independent churches, and his 1948 fieldwork reflects one period before these movements grew and diversified much further across the continent.

Facts
Citation
Author
Bengt G. M. Sundkler
Publisher
Oxford University Press for the International African Institute
Likely the 1961 second edition; Sundkler's Bantu Prophets in South Africa was first published in 1948 by Lutterworth Press.
Publication Year
1948
URL
https://archive.org/details/bantuprophetsins0000sund
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The foundational scholarly study of the African Independent Church movement, from a university press.
Notes
Foundational scholarly study of the African Independent/Initiated Church movement, focused on Zulu Zionist and Ethiopian-type churches in South Africa; revised second edition 1961.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Africa, Continents

This source names Africa directly: "a missionary and scholar who studied African independent churches directly through fieldwork in South Africa, and this academic book, published by Oxford University Press for the International..."

Source Bantu Prophets in South AfricaBengt G. M. Sundkler
Claims Backed By This Source (45 claims)

This source backs 45 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 7 holds, 1 connected, 2 held Differently. Plus 11 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Denominations, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 holds, 3 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Doctrines, 6 claims: 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Religious Movements, 5 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 2 held Differently, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Regions, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Language Families, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

2

Historical Figures

Religious Movements

Connected

1

Cultures

Held Differently

2

Religious Movements

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.