De Praestigiis Daemonum is Johann Weyer's own sixteenth century primary text arguing against the reasoning behind contemporary witch prosecutions, in substance a direct rebuttal of the Malleus Maleficarum. The year recorded, 1563, is the first edition specifically; the work went through several later enlarged editions, and the demon catalogue now known as the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum was only added as an appendix to the fifth edition, of 1577, a distinction this atlas keeps separate rather than blurring the two dates. Use it to establish what Weyer's own original argument said; the later demon catalogue is a separate later addition with its own separate citation.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Johann Weyer's own sixteenth century primary text arguing against the reasoning behind contemporary witch prosecutions, in substance a direct rebuttal of the Malleus Maleficarum. NotesWeyer's attack on the reasoning behind the witch prosecutions, in substance a rebuttal of the Malleus Maleficarum. Year given is that of the first edition; the work went through several enlarged editions, and the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum catalogue was added as an appendix to the fifth, of 1577.
Citation
AuthorJohann Weyer
PublisherJohannes Oporinus
Publication Year1563
URLhttps://archive.org/details/depraestigiisdae00weye
Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (415 claims)
This source backs 415 claims across the atlas. As facts: 334 well-attested. Plus 81 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Goetic Demons, 360 claims: 288 well-attested, 72 general references.
- Spirit Ranks, 28 claims: 21 well-attested, 7 general references.
- Esoteric Texts, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Historical Figures, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
Well-attested
334Showing 51 to 86 of 86 entities carrying this claim.
General References
81Showing 1 to 50 of 81 entities carrying this claim.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.