Source

Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences (the Ninety-Five Theses)

Martin Luther's Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences, commonly known as the Ninety-Five Theses, is a primary source of the first order, the actual document Luther is traditionally said to have posted in 1517, directly launching the theological controversy over indulgences that became the Protestant Reformation. As Luther's own words, it is unmatched authority for what he argued at that founding moment, before his positions developed further in later writings. It is a polemical academic disputation written to provoke scholarly debate within the existing Catholic university system, not a settled theological system or a neutral historical account of indulgence practice, and its specific claims about contemporary indulgence preaching reflect Luther's own contested reading of events rather than an independently verified record.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: the primary founding document itself, unmatched authority for what its author argued at that moment, a polemical disputation rather than a neutral historical account.
Notes
Luther's foundational primary text disputing the sale and efficacy of indulgences, the Ninety-Five Theses.
Citation
Author
Martin Luther
Publication Year
1517
Source Type
primary-text
Connections

Associated With

Martin Luther, Figures

This source names Martin Luther directly: "Martin Luther's Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences, commonly known as the Ninety-Five Theses, is a primary source of the first order, the actual document Luther is traditionally..."

Source Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences (the Ninety-Five Theses)Martin Luther
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 1 rejected Here. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 4 claims: 1 critiqued Here, 1 rejected Here, 2 general references.
  • Figures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Denominations, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme