Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

First and Second Maccabees

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

First and Second Maccabees are the primary texts themselves, two independent anonymous Jewish historical works composed in the second and first centuries BCE recounting the Maccabean revolt against Seleucid rule and the rededication of the Jerusalem Temple that Hanukkah commemorates, included in the Catholic and Orthodox biblical canons as deuterocanonical books though excluded from the Jewish and Protestant canons. Their strength is that they are close in time to the events they describe, First Maccabees in particular written from a perspective sympathetic to the Hasmonean dynasty it helped legitimate, giving a documented near contemporary account rather than a later retelling. Their limit is that the two books do not fully agree with each other on details and both write with a clear dynastic or theological agenda rather than as disinterested history, so a claim resting on a specific factual detail of the revolt should note which book it comes from and read it against the other rather than treating either as a neutral record.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
First and Second Maccabees are the primary texts themselves, close in time to the Maccabean revolt they describe, treated at the top tier as that primary near contemporary record.
Notes
Deuterocanonical; in Catholic and Orthodox Bibles, outside the Jewish and Protestant canons. The earliest accounts of the rededication and the eight-day festival, containing no reference to the cruse of oil.
Citation
Author
Anonymous
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Jerusalem, Cities

This source names Jerusalem directly: "rule and the rededication of the Jerusalem Temple that Hanukkah commemorates, included in the Catholic and Orthodox biblical canons as deuterocanonical books though excluded from the Jewish and..."

Source First and Second MaccabeesAnonymous
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Religious Events, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Holidays & Festivals, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Miracles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.