Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Queen of the Night, Museum Catalogue Text (Google Arts and Culture / British Museum)

Google Arts and Culture, reproducing the British Museum's own catalogue text, read 2026-08-18

A Google Arts and Culture partner page for "The Queen of the Night," reproducing the British Museum's own published catalogue text for registration 2003,0718.1, giving the Old Babylonian date, fired clay material, dimensions of 49.5 by 37 by 4.8 centimeters, a description of the winged, taloned, horned figure standing on lions and flanked by owls, and the museum's own stated position that the goddess "cannot be definitely identified" but naming Ishtar or her underworld sister and rival Ereshkigal as the two candidates it puts forward. The museum acquired the plaque in 2003 as a principal purchase marking its 250th anniversary.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own published catalogue text for the object, distributed through a Google Arts and Culture partner page, giving registration number, date, material, dimensions and the museum's own stated position on the disputed identification, independently corroborated by the Wikipedia article's account of the same dispute.
Citation
Publisher
Google Arts and Culture, British Museum partner content
URL
https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/the-queen-of-the-night/eQEfwhChzs0z6A
Source Type
Museum
Connections

Associated With

Ereshkigal, Deities

This source names Ereshkigal directly: "or her underworld sister and rival Ereshkigal as the two candidates it puts forward."

Source The Queen of the Night, Museum Catalogue Text (Google Arts and Culture / British Museum)
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.