Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Global Salafism: Islam's New Religious Movement

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is a standard scholarly edited volume, with named specialist contributors surveying Salafism as a global Islamic movement, each addressing its theology, politics or regional variation from their own documented area of research rather than one editor summarizing the whole movement secondhand. That contributor-by-contributor specialist method is the volume's real evidentiary basis. This record states its own limit plainly: coverage of any one aspect or region of Salafism depends entirely on which chapter addresses it, so a topic no chapter treats in depth is not covered here at all. Use it for established scholarly facts about a covered aspect of Salafism that a specific chapter directly addresses.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A standard scholarly edited volume surveying Salafism as a global Islamic movement with chapters by specialist contributors; coverage of a given topic depends on which contributor wrote that chapter.
Notes
Standard scholarly edited volume surveying Salafism as a global Islamic movement, with chapters by specialist contributors covering its theology, politics and regional variation. Use for established scholarly facts about a covered aspect of Salafism; coverage is uneven by topic since it depends on which contributor wrote a given chapter.
Citation
Author
Roel Meijer (ed.)
Publisher
Hurst
Publication Year
2009
Source Type
Scholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Global, Continents

This source names Global directly: "contributors surveying Salafism as a global Islamic movement, each addressing its theology, politics or regional variation from their own documented area of research rather than one editor..."

This source names Salafism directly: "specialist contributors surveying Salafism as a global Islamic movement, each addressing its theology, politics or regional variation from their own documented area of research rather than one..."

Claims Backed By This Source (145 claims)

This source backs 145 claims across the atlas. As facts: 71 well-attested, 8 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 29 holds, 4 connected, 2 critiqued Here, 7 rejected Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 23 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 38 claims: 28 well-attested, 1 holds, 4 connected, 5 general references.
  • Denominations, 38 claims: 13 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 12 holds, 7 rejected Here, 1 held Differently, 2 general references.
  • Organizations, 28 claims: 15 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 9 holds, 3 general references.
  • Doctrines, 17 claims: 4 well-attested, 4 holds, 2 critiqued Here, 7 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 10 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Figures, 3 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Rejected Here

7

Denominations

Held Differently

1

Denominations

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.