David Stophlet Flattery and Martin Schwartz are scholars of ancient Iranian religion and philology, and this University of California Press book is their scholarly argument that the Avestan sacred drink haoma, and by extension the closely related Vedic soma, was Peganum harmala, Syrian rue, rather than the various other candidate plants that have been proposed. Its strength is a closely reasoned philological and botanical argument engaging directly with the primary Avestan and Vedic textual descriptions. Its limit is the same one this atlas applies to other closely argued but unproven botanical identification hypotheses, such as Wasson's fly agaric proposal for soma, it remains a serious candidate among several rather than an established finding, which is why it sits at this reliability tier and is cited as one candidate identification rather than the settled answer.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Though academically published by the University of California Press, Flattery and Schwartz's identification of Haoma with harmaline is their own contested scholarly hypothesis rather than an established consensus, so it is cited here as that hypothesis's own account rather than as settled independent evidence. NotesArgues that the Avestan haoma, and by extension the Vedic soma, was Peganum harmala. Tier 3 for the same reason as Wasson: a serious and closely argued hypothesis that is not established. Cited as one candidate among several.
Citation
AuthorDavid Stophlet Flattery and Martin Schwartz
PublisherUniversity of California Press
Publication Year1989
URLhttps://archive.org/details/HaomaHarmaline
Source Typeacademic monograph
Connections
Associated With
Soma, Deities This source names Soma directly: "by extension the closely related Vedic soma, was Peganum harmala, Syrian rue, rather than the various other candidate plants that have been proposed."
Source Haoma and Harmaline: The Botanical Identity of the Indo-Iranian Sacred Hallucinogen and Its Legacy in Religion, Language, and Middle Eastern FolkloreDavid Stophlet Flattery and Martin Schwartz
Claims Backed By This Source (38 claims)
This source backs 38 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 6 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 11 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Plants, 16 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 8 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 7 claims: 3 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
- Studies, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
Scholarly debate
6Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Holds
11Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
General References
5Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.