Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Her Hidden Children: The Rise of Wicca and Paganism in America

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Chas Clifton's history is the standard scholarly account of American Wicca specifically, and its real evidentiary basis is coverage no comparably standard British history provides: it traces the Dianic, Feri, Reclaiming, Seax-Wica and eclectic solitary lines that developed distinctly in the United States, which Ronald Hutton's history of British paganism does not cover. That documented, lineage-by-lineage American focus is why this atlas holds it as the authority for those specific traditions. This record has not independently traced further scholarly disagreement with Clifton's specific claims since 2006. Use it for established historical facts about these specifically American Wiccan and Pagan lineages; a claim about British Wicca's origins needs Hutton's history addressed instead.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Chas Clifton's standard scholarly account of American Wicca specifically, tracing the Dianic, Feri, Reclaiming, Seax-Wica and eclectic solitary lines that developed distinctly in the United States, coverage no comparably standard British history provides.
Notes
The standard scholarly history of American Wicca; the authority here for the Dianic, Feri, Reclaiming, Seax-Wica and eclectic solitary lines, which Hutton's British history does not cover.
Citation
Author
Chas S. Clifton
Publisher
AltaMira Press
Publication Year
2006
URL
https://archive.org/details/herhiddenchildre0000clif
Source Type
Monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Reclaiming directly: "provides: it traces the Dianic, Feri, Reclaiming, Seax-Wica and eclectic solitary lines that developed distinctly in the United States, which Ronald Hutton's history of British paganism does not..."

This source names Seax-Wica directly: "traces the Dianic, Feri, Reclaiming, Seax-Wica and eclectic solitary lines that developed distinctly in the United States, which Ronald Hutton's history of British paganism does not cover."

Claims Backed By This Source (170 claims)

This source backs 170 claims across the atlas. As facts: 125 well-attested. As cited relationships: 16 holds, 2 connected, 1 rejected Here, 3 held Differently. Plus 23 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Denominations, 83 claims: 68 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 connected, 3 held Differently, 7 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 33 claims: 25 well-attested, 8 general references.
  • Articles, 16 claims: 16 well-attested.
  • Doctrines, 14 claims: 9 holds, 1 rejected Here, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Open Questions, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Years, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Mythical Creatures, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Rejected Here

1

Held Differently

3
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.