The Huangdi Neijing is a primary Chinese medical text compiled in stages across several centuries, from the Warring States period through the Han dynasty, with no single author and no single date of composition, a layered origin this record states rather than assigning one false date to it. As a primary text it is authoritative for what the Lingshu states about acupuncture and meridian theory or what the Suwen states about the theoretical foundations of Chinese medicine, checkable directly against the text, not for a settled account of which passages belong to which historical layer, which remains a matter of ongoing textual scholarship. Use it to establish what a named passage of the Lingshu or Suwen itself states; a claim resting on the text's precise compositional history or on modern clinical practice needs a dedicated scholarly source such as Unschuld and Tessenow's critical translation of the Suwen.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
A primary Chinese medical text compiled in stages from the Warring States period through the Han dynasty, its actual authorship unknown despite the traditional attribution; the Lingshu division treats acupuncture and meridian theory, the Suwen the theoretical foundations of Chinese medicine. NotesCompiled in stages from the Warring States period (475-221 BCE) through the Han dynasty; the Lingshu division treats acupuncture and meridian theory in detail, the Suwen the theoretical foundations of Chinese medicine.
Citation
AuthorTraditionally attributed to Huangdi; actual authorship unknown
URLhttps://ctext.org/huangdi-neijing
Source Typeprimary-text
Connections
Associated With
This source names Huangdi directly: "The Huangdi Neijing is a primary Chinese medical text compiled in stages across several centuries, from the Warring States period through the Han dynasty, with no single author and no single date of..."
Source Huangdi Neijing (The Yellow Emperor's Inner Classic)Traditionally attributed to Huangdi; actual authorship unknown
Claims Backed By This Source (133 claims)
This source backs 133 claims across the atlas. As facts: 55 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 52 holds. Plus 24 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Disciplines, 51 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 41 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 21 claims: 21 well-attested.
- Elements, 20 claims: 5 well-attested, 10 holds, 5 general references.
- Meridians, 14 claims: 7 well-attested, 7 general references.
- Colors, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 5 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Incense, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Body Parts, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.