Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Identification of Biblical Hyssop and Origin of the Traditional Use of Oregano-Group Herbs in the Mediterranean Region

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Alexander Fleisher and Zhenia Fleisher published this peer-reviewed article in the journal Economic Botany in 1988, arguing from comparative ethnobotany of the oregano group herbs that the hyssop mentioned in the Bible is the carvacrol chemotype of what is now classified as Origanum syriacum. Its strength is a genuine, checkable botanical argument, the identification is reasoned from documented traditional usage patterns across the Mediterranean region rather than assumed from tradition alone, and its bibliographic details are independently confirmed against Crossref and NASA's astrophysics data system. Its limit is that the identification is reached by inference from later usage rather than from an ancient botanical description of the plant itself, which is exactly why the biblical hyssop's identity remains an open question rather than a settled one.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A peer reviewed botanical journal article arguing from comparative ethnobotany that the hyssop of the Bible is what is now called Origanum syriacum; the identification is reached by inference from later usage rather than an ancient botanical description, which is why the question stays open.
Notes
Pages 232 to 241. Argues from the comparative ethnobotany of the oregano group herbs that the hyssop of the Bible is the carvacrol chemotype of Majorana syriaca, now treated as Origanum syriacum. The identification is reached by inference from later usage rather than from an ancient botanical description, which is why the question stays open. Bibliographic details confirmed against Crossref and the NASA ADS record; abstract read, full text not opened.
Citation
Author
Alexander Fleisher and Zhenia Fleisher
Publisher
Economic Botany, volume 42, number 2
Publication Year
1988
URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858924
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (39 claims)

This source backs 39 claims across the atlas. As facts: 28 well-attested, 2 open question. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 4 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 21 claims: 15 well-attested, 4 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Studies, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 open question, 1 general references.
  • Plants, 3 claims: 1 open question, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.

Holds

1

Plants

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.