Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Original Enlightenment and the Transformation of Medieval Japanese Buddhism

Jacqueline I. Stone is a scholar of Japanese Buddhism, and this University of Hawaii Press book is her scholarly study of hongaku, original enlightenment thought, and its transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism. Its strength is that Stone traces how this doctrine, that enlightenment is already inherently present rather than something to be attained, reshaped Tendai thought and practice across the medieval period, drawing on close reading of the relevant Japanese textual sources. Its limit is that it centers on the Tendai school's development of hongaku thought specifically, so a claim about how a related but distinct school, such as Nichiren Buddhism, drew on or diverged from this doctrine needs a source addressing that separate tradition.

Facts
Citation
Author
Jacqueline I. Stone
Publisher
University of Hawaii Press
Publication Year
1999
URL
https://archive.org/details/originalenlighte0000ston
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Jacqueline Stone's University of Hawaii Press scholarly study of the hongaku, or original enlightenment, doctrine and its transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism.
Notes
Scholarly study of the hongaku (original enlightenment) doctrine and its transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism.
Connections

Associated With

Tendai, Denominations

This source names Tendai directly: "transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism."

Source Original Enlightenment and the Transformation of Medieval Japanese BuddhismJacqueline I. Stone
Claims Backed By This Source (44 claims)

This source backs 44 claims across the atlas. As facts: 30 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 3 connected. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 19 claims: 12 well-attested, 3 connected, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 general references.
  • Doctrines, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

2

Beliefs & Restrictions

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.