Jacqueline I. Stone is a scholar of Japanese Buddhism, and this University of Hawaii Press book is her scholarly study of hongaku, original enlightenment thought, and its transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism. Its strength is that Stone traces how this doctrine, that enlightenment is already inherently present rather than something to be attained, reshaped Tendai thought and practice across the medieval period, drawing on close reading of the relevant Japanese textual sources. Its limit is that it centers on the Tendai school's development of hongaku thought specifically, so a claim about how a related but distinct school, such as Nichiren Buddhism, drew on or diverged from this doctrine needs a source addressing that separate tradition.
Facts
Citation
AuthorJacqueline I. Stone
PublisherUniversity of Hawaii Press
Publication Year1999
URLhttps://archive.org/details/originalenlighte0000ston
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Jacqueline Stone's University of Hawaii Press scholarly study of the hongaku, or original enlightenment, doctrine and its transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism. NotesScholarly study of the hongaku (original enlightenment) doctrine and its transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Tendai directly: "transformation of medieval Japanese Tendai Buddhism."
Source Original Enlightenment and the Transformation of Medieval Japanese BuddhismJacqueline I. Stone
Claims Backed By This Source (44 claims)
This source backs 44 claims across the atlas. As facts: 30 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 3 connected. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 19 claims: 12 well-attested, 3 connected, 4 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 general references.
- Doctrines, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.