Phantasms of the Living is the Society for Psychical Research's own founding study, written jointly by Edmund Gurney, Frederic W. H. Myers and Frank Podmore, collecting and analyzing reported cases of telepathic hallucinations and crisis apparitions, images of a person seen at the moment of their death or crisis at a distance. As the founding text of organized psychical research it is the correct primary source for how the society itself first approached and categorized this class of reported experience. Its limit is the one later psychical researchers themselves raised, the case collection method relies on retrospective witness testimony gathered after the fact, which is inherently harder to verify than a controlled experiment, so a claim treating any individual case as proven telepathy should be read as the society's own contemporary evidentiary standard rather than a modern controlled result.
Facts
Citation
AuthorEdmund Gurney, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore
PublisherTrubner and Co.
Publication Year1886
URLhttps://archive.org/details/phantasmsoflivin01gurn
Source Typeprimary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Phantasms of the Living is the Society for Psychical Research founders' own primary published case collection, issued through Trubner and Co.; cited here as that primary text itself rather than outside commentary on it. NotesSPR's founding study of telepathic hallucinations and crisis apparitions.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Franks directly: "Phantasms of the Living is the Society for Psychical Research's own founding study, written jointly by Edmund Gurney, Frederic W."
Source Phantasms of the LivingEdmund Gurney, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)
This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Psi Phenomena, 16 claims: 5 well-attested, 6 holds, 5 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Historical Figures, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.