Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Pseudoscience and the Paranormal

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Terence Hines is a psychologist, and this book, published by Prometheus Books, an academic press specializing in skeptical and secular scholarship, critically examines a wide range of paranormal and pseudoscientific claims, including astrology and ESP, against the standards of scientific evidence. Its strength is systematic application of experimental and statistical method to claims that are often evaluated only anecdotally elsewhere, making it a useful counterweight source for claims about a practice's tested predictive or empirical validity specifically. Its limit is that, as a skeptical survey covering many different topics in one volume, its treatment of any single practice is necessarily briefer than a dedicated study of that one practice alone, and it should be read as a critical evaluation rather than a comprehensive account of the traditions it examines.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Terence Hines's critical scholarly review of Rhine-era ESP testing, sensory leakage and the Pratt-Woodruff and Pearce-Pratt experimental series.
Notes
Critical review of Rhine-era ESP testing, sensory leakage, and the Pratt-Woodruff and Pearce-Pratt series.
Citation
Author
Terence Hines
Publisher
Prometheus Books
Publication Year
2003
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (62 claims)

This source backs 62 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 33 holds. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Disciplines, 34 claims: 33 holds, 1 general references.
  • Psi Phenomena, 12 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 popular myth - corrected, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Studies, 2 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.