A peer reviewed academic article analyzing the film PK's treatment of religion, by two scholars at institutions in Jammu and Kashmir, India. Its strength is peer review and a scholarly focus specifically on the film's religious content. Its limit is that this atlas could verify its bibliographic record, journal, volume, issue and abstract directly, but the publisher's full text sat behind an access wall not reachable during research, so it is cited here for the fact of sustained scholarly attention to the film's religious subject matter rather than quoted for specific findings.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Monisa Qadri and Sabeha Mufti's peer reviewed article analyzing the film PK's treatment of religion, published in the Journal of Religion & Film, the top tier reflecting standard academic peer review and a scholarly focus specifically on the film's religious content, notwithstanding that the publisher's full text sat behind an access wall not reachable during research, so it is cited here for the fact of sustained scholarly attention to the film's religious subject matter rather than quoted for specific findings. NotesDOI 10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.20.01.09. A scholarly analysis of the film's religious content, published in a peer reviewed journal of religion and film studies.
Citation
AuthorMonisa Qadri and Sabeha Mufti
PublisherJournal of Religion & Film, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, Article 9
Publication Year2016
URLhttps://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol20/iss1/9/
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Connections
Associated With
This source names India directly: "at institutions in Jammu and Kashmir, India."
Source Qadri and Mufti, "Films and Religion: An Analysis of Aamir Khan's PK," Journal of Religion & Film, 2016Monisa Qadri and Sabeha Mufti
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)
This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 2 connected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Screen Works, 6 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 connected, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.