Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Rare Earth Elements: Critical Resources for High Technology

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is the United States Geological Survey's own Fact Sheet 087-02, Rare Earth Elements, Critical Resources for High Technology, published in 2002 by Gordon Haxel, James Hedrick and Greta Orris. As a government scientific agency's own reference document it is authoritative for the basic geology and industrial use of the rare earth elements it describes. Its limit, worth naming directly, is that the fact sheet itself is internally inconsistent on one point: page two names thulium and lutetium together as the two least abundant rare earth elements without ranking them, while page four separately calls lutetium the least abundant. A single authoritative document disagreeing with itself across its own pages is the clearest evidence available that the precise ranking is not a settled fact, and a claim citing this source for that ranking should say so rather than pick one page silently.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
This is the United States Geological Survey's own Fact Sheet 087-02, published in 2002, a government scientific agency's own reference document, treated at the top tier, notwithstanding that the fact sheet is internally inconsistent on the ranking of the least abundant rare earth element.
Notes
Page 2 names thulium and lutetium together as the two least abundant rare earth elements without ranking them. Page 4 then calls lutetium this least abundant of the rare earth elements. A single authoritative fact sheet disagreeing with itself across two pages is the clearest available evidence that the ranking is not settled.
Citation
Author
Gordon B. Haxel, James B. Hedrick and Greta J. Orris
Publisher
United States Geological Survey Fact Sheet 087-02
Publication Year
2002
URL
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02/fs087-02.pdf
Source Type
government
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)

This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 2 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Periodic Elements, 2 claims: 1 open question, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.