Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Report on the Census of Hallucinations

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Report on the Census of Hallucinations is a large scale survey conducted by Henry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore and Alice Johnson under the Society for Psychical Research, published in the Society's own Proceedings in 1894, surveying roughly seventeen thousand respondents between 1889 and 1894 about waking apparition experiences. Its strength is scale and method for its era, a coordinated, multi investigator survey of this size was genuinely unusual for late Victorian psychical research, and the Society's Proceedings applied real editorial scrutiny before publication. Its limit is the inherent one for any survey of self reported subjective experience collected well over a century ago, it documents what respondents said they experienced, not an independently verified explanation of what caused those experiences.

Facts
Citation
Author
Henry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson
Publisher
Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, Vol. X
Publication Year
1894
URL
https://archive.org/details/proceedingsofsoc10soci
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Report on the Census of Hallucinations, a Society for Psychical Research survey of seventeen thousand respondents on waking apparitions conducted from 1889 to 1894, published in the Society's own Proceedings.
Notes
SPR survey of 17,000 respondents on waking apparitions, 1889-1894.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Franks, Cultures

This source names Franks directly: "The Report on the Census of Hallucinations is a large scale survey conducted by Henry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W."

Source Report on the Census of HallucinationsHenry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson
Claims Backed By This Source (43 claims)

This source backs 43 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 open question. As cited relationships: 6 holds, 4 connected. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 12 claims: 7 well-attested, 4 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Studies, 8 claims: 3 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Psi Phenomena, 6 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 open question, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Historical Figures

Open question

2
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.